My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
12-10-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 3:28:55 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 3:28:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1521- LOMBARDOZI CONTINUED <br />evening." <br />• <br />Goetten agreed that the issue of compensation is significant <br />and a legal opinion must be rendered before Council could act. <br />Mr. Wear said, "I would just like to say one thing. This <br />boiler plate that is being talked about -- it was there, it was <br />well known. My intent when we made the subdivision was to have <br />access go on there, but to get paid for it. It was very clear at <br />that point, because $20,000 is obviously exuberant. It was also <br />there to stall anybody. We wanted to sell our land, and after <br />that we don't care." <br />Bellows stated that the decisions made by the Planning <br />Commission cannot include considerations for financial loss or <br />gain. She added that outlots are created for the purpose of <br />providing a sensible plan for the City. She said, "Thee Planning <br />Commission does not feel it is appropriate to gerrymander around <br />what has been and established and reasonable plan. The issue as <br />to whether or not the road is public or private, was an issue of <br />great debate amongst the Planning Commission members. It is an <br />issue we would like to see addressed. However, the Planning <br />Commission feels this is a separate issue. We had planned for <br />that northern extension to be there in the event these properties <br />were ever developed. That is now happening." <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to table . <br />this matter pending receipt of an opinion from the Cit17 Attorney <br />regarding Mr. Wear's comments, and the overall situation with <br />road becoming public as a result of the underlying easements and <br />our ability to do that. Motion, Ayes -3, Mayor G_abek, Nay. <br />Motion passed. <br />#1584 ROBERT RADUNZ, 1066 LOMA LINDA <br />AFTER- THE -FACT VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2904 <br />Mr. Radunz was present. <br />Bernhardson briefly explained the Variances involved in this <br />application. He stated that Mr. Radunz has proposed an overall <br />hardcover reduction from 69.6% to 49.5% in the 75 -250' zone, and <br />from 6.61% to 1.12% in the 0 -75' zone. Bernhardson noted that the <br />Planning Commission had unanimously recommended approval. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution #2904, granting after - the -fact hardcover, average <br />lakeshore setback, a---id side setback Variances for the <br />construction of deck. Motion, Ayes -4, Nays -0. Motion passed. <br />- 9 - • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.