My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
12-10-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 3:28:55 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 3:28:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1990 <br />#1475 JOHN MCDOWELL, 4105 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />• FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL <br />RESOLUTION #2903* <br />Mr. McDowell was present. <br />It was moved by Mayor Gr_abek, seconded by Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution #2903, approving the Plat of Bayside Ridge. Motion, <br />Ayes -4, Nays -0. Motion passed. <br />#1521 STEVEN LOMBARDOZI, 115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />Mr. Lombardozi and Mr. Gary Peterson were present, as was <br />Mr. Bill Wear. <br />Bernha -dson summarized the information provided in Jeanne <br />Mabusth's memo dated December 3, 1990, noting that access is the <br />primary issue involved in this subdivision. He said, "The <br />Planning Commission had recommended that the private road <br />directly south in the Wear subdivision be extended and that both <br />the cul -de -sac to the south and east be made public. He said, <br />"The public road could then serve this subdivision 'and other <br />subdivisions that may occur to the north. Alternatives to the <br />Planning Commission recommendation could include just making the <br />one leg public under the City's road and utility easements, or <br />the City could provide access by means of an Ordinance amendment <br />that was approved a year ago." <br />• It was moved by Mayor Grabek to adopt the Resolution <br />approving the preliminary subdivision for Al Kreb. The motion <br />failed for a lack of a second. <br />Peterson asked the City Attorney how it would be possible to <br />open a private road to the public. <br />Barrett replied, "The distinction here is that the City has <br />underlying easements, which would allow the road to be opened to <br />the public. T_iat is non - controversial. As a result of the Wear <br />subdivision, the City obtained a public road easement, over which <br />a private road was constructed. If the City wishes to make the <br />private road public, there is a procedure that can be done to <br />accomplish that. Tne other issue is that if someone has a <br />private road, the City can require, as a condition of owning the <br />private road, that members of the public that must use the road <br />to access their property be allowed to use that road to do so. <br />It is my opinion that the City can do that, though such a method <br />is more controversial." <br />Peterson asked Mr. Wear if it is his wish to have the road <br />remain private. <br />Mr. Wear replied, "No} necessarily, but we do want to be <br />paid for it. You are acquiring our property without any warrant. <br />• - 6 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.