My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
12-10-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 3:28:55 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 3:28:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1990 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS CONTINUED <br />• such events. <br />Bellows also stated that she had comments pertaining to item <br />#4 on the agenda and questioned whether she should comment at <br />this time or when item #4 is discussed. <br />Mayor Grabek suggested that Bellows delay her comments until <br />item #4 is presented. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br />Ms. Linda Whitman, 3620 Eileen Street, presented a petition <br />on behalf of persons with a specific position regarding the <br />Highway 12 Corridor location. Ms. Whitman read the petition and <br />noted that it was signed by over 330 people. She said, "Many of <br />the people who signed this petition indicated that they prefer <br />the Highway 12 corridor to be as far north as possible. They are <br />not in favor of the County Road 6, present Highway 12, or Luce <br />Line locations. The petition does not specifically express this <br />point of view, but I would like the Council to understand that is <br />the position of many citizens." <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />#1334 REBERS CONSTRUCTION- SUGARWOODS PLAT <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PRD <br />Mr. Sid Rebers and Mr. Stephen Pflaum, his Attorney, were <br />is present. <br />Bernhardson explained that two resolutions were being <br />presented this evening that pertained to the review process for <br />driveways in the Sugarwoods Plat. He said, "One resolution <br />requires that thz- Planning Commission and Council participate in <br />the review process. The driveway request would be reviewed by <br />the Planning Commission and would then be scheduled for the <br />Council meeting immediately following. The other resolution <br />would permit only the Planning Commission to review these <br />requests. Council would only become involved in the event of an <br />appeal." <br />Mabusth added that she had not received any additional <br />information from the Planning Commission subsequent to their <br />November 19th meeting. <br />Bellows stated that she had comments on behalf of the <br />Planning Commission to make at this time. <br />Mayor Gr_abek asked her to proceed with her comments. <br />Bellows said, "The Planning Commission has, from the <br />beginning, objected to the use of templates in lieu of Planning <br />Commission and Council review. We feel that there does need to <br />0 - 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.