My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-03-1990 Council Minutes Budget Hearing
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
12-03-1990 Council Minutes Budget Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 3:26:46 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 3:26:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING MEETING HELD DECEMBER 3, 1990 <br />12. Those costs a-e being specially assessed against the • <br />developers. If this levy is adopted, the City can collect taxes <br />for those bonds ahead of time and allow the City to pay them off <br />and, in the long run, reduce taxes. The City could then use the <br />special assessment income received to offset taxes in the future. <br />This would put the City in a better financial position." <br />Bernhardson explained what impact all of this information <br />would have on the individual taxpayer. He said, "The City takes <br />approximately 13% of your taxes and is proposing to increase that <br />by 13.1 %. That translates to a total tax increase of <br />approximately 1.7 %. For every $1,000 paid in property taxes in <br />1990, the proposed maximum increase will be $17.00 or $1.41 per <br />month." <br />Bernhardson concluded his presentation and Acting Mayor <br />Callahan called for public comments. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br />Mr. Leo Bullock, 2940 Casco Point Road, noted a discrepancy <br />between the Notice and the levy information. He stated that the <br />notice shows $1,853,541 and the levy information s ?lows <br />$1,823,541. <br />Bernhardson apologized for the typographical error and <br />stated that the Notice is correct. • <br />Mr. John Farnham, 3225 Carman Road, appreciated the <br />opportunity to participate in the budget process. Mr. Farnham <br />said, "I assume that all of our concerns will be listened to and <br />considered before any vote is taken. I disagreed with the <br />process that took place recently with Hennepin County. My main <br />goal is to convince the Council that some changes need to occur <br />in that 13.1% budget increase. I am hoping that the Council will <br />see that the total tax situation, especially the property taxes, <br />in Hennepin County have reached what I call crises proportions. <br />I believe the term crises is appropriate for the following <br />reasons: On the National front, we have finally reached a <br />consensus that we are in a recession. The main disagreements are <br />the degree and length. Minnesota is not likely to avoid the <br />recession completely. Recession can have many negative aspects <br />such as business slow downs and failures, rising unemployment, <br />personal bankruptcies. Inflation will create personal hardships <br />of many kinds, including the inability to pay taxes. On the <br />State level, our government faces a 1.2 billion dollar shortfall. <br />According to past experience, that will be made up by spending <br />cuts and tax increases. Thirdly, the County government has just <br />hit us with the third straight double -digit tax increase and the <br />school districts are doing the same. The Metropolitan Council is <br />now considering a new Metro /Area -wide half percent sales tax, <br />plus possibly increasing the four other Metro -wide property taxes <br />- 3 - 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.