Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO. 6966 <br /> SHo�� <br /> conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br /> of property in the surrounding area. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ."The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose <br /> of the Ordinance. The lot includes difficulties in its substandard size and width, location of <br /> adjacent homes, and the existing home's proximity to the lake. The average lakeshore <br /> setback variance will not further impact views of the lake for adjacent properties. <br /> 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan." The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record <br /> are consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br /> practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in <br /> connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br /> a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br /> however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br /> The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the <br /> proposed location within the lake and average lakeshore setbacks, appears to be <br /> somewhat reasonable as the Applicants are proposing to build within the existing <br /> lakeside footprint, the Property's nonconforming size, and the neighboring homes' <br /> orientation with respect to the lakeshore, and adjacent properties creates <br /> difficulties. The hardcover level, and building encroachments proposed within the <br /> lake yard and average lakeshore setback do not exceed existing setbacks and do <br /> not appear to be unreasonable. <br /> b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br /> by the landowner. <br /> The nonconforming lot size, the existing home's location with respect to the lake <br /> and the neighboring home locations prevent a residential footprint consistent with <br /> the neighborhood. The proposed overall hardcover level is conforming. The <br /> circumstances are unique to the Property; and <br /> c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." <br /> The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed <br /> to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. <br /> 3 <br />