Re: excavating - Laserfiche WebLink

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

Farr Construction 100 Bridge Avenue Licensed—Bonded-Insured Delano, MN 55328 (763)972-3005 June 5, 2003 LA Mr. Steve Hankey Miller Brewing Company 2600 Thoroughbred Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 VIA CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Re: CONFIRMATION OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Mr. Hankey, As follows is a summation of our telephone conversation on or about May 21, 2003 when you called in response of my May 5a', 2003 letter to you. You said that you would consider this whole issue settled if- 1. f1. We repaired alleged lawn damaged by our work activities in the ditch in front of your property. 2. We installed soil over the small amount of tree roots that were exposed. 3. We would agree to take down a tree on your property because you thought that that it might fall down on your property in a storm. You said that this would satisfy all your claims and agreed to send a written proposal signed by you confirming the aforementioned. I went out to the Havir property that abuts your property to the West on June 4th 2003. After carefully considering the abovementioned items 1-3 our position is as follows: 1. Our company did not damage your lawn in the ditch area or anywhere else for that matter. We did no work on your site with any equipment,during the winter, on top of snow cover that could have damaged your lawn. There is no evidence of new sod, new grass shoots or lawn repair visible. Consequently if there are no signs of repair or visible damage we did not damage your lawn. Your yard was again photographed and these photographs visibly support our assertions. 2. Black dirt was installed over the area where a small amount of tree roots were showing. All of the trees on your property were in full leaf, not wilted and in excellent condition. We took photographs of the trees also.