Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1555 - LANDSTAR CONTINUED <br />• did not specify whether it would be one and half or two inches." <br />Bernhardson stated that the request for two inches of <br />overlay was subsequent to the statements made by Ms. Hurr. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan asked the Council for their opinion <br />regarding the financial responsibility for the road. <br />Goetten asked Gerhardson if in fact_ Old Beach Road was on <br />the Public Works schedule for bituminous work. <br />Gerhardson replied, "Yes, we were going to do the project <br />this fall. However, we decided Lo delay the project until this <br />issue was resolved." <br />Peterson said, "If it was the City's intent to put an <br />overlay on this road, then I believe we should charge the <br />developer 25%." <br />Goetten asked whether this situation has ever occurred in <br />the past. <br />Gerhardson stated that it has not. <br />Goetten stated that charging 25% would be fair. <br />• Peterson asked why Staff is recommending 500. <br />Cook replied, "In my opinion, this is a new development. <br />The developer has not contributed to this road in any way in the <br />past. I believe the developer has some obligation to contribute <br />to the road. In other subdivisions, the developer is asked to <br />pay for the entire road." <br />It was moved by Nettles, seconded by Goetten, to adopt <br />Resolution #2900, granting the Preliminary Subdivision for E. W. <br />Blanch, (Landstar, Inc.), with the requirement that Old Brach <br />Road have a one and a half inch overlay and that the developer <br />pay half of the cost of that project. Motion, Ayes -3, Acting <br />Mayor Callahan, Nay. Motion passed. <br />#1579 GARRY AND MARIE EVERSON <br />4755 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2898 <br />Bernhardson provided a brief summary of the Everson's <br />revised proposal, noting that the Planning Commission had <br />recommended approval. <br />Mrs. Everson stated that she objected to the additional <br />$175.00 fee which she was being asked to pay as a penalty. She <br />• <br />9 <br />