My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
09-10-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 12:27:30 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 12:27:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1334- REBERS CONTINUED <br />which he made to both staff and Maureen, the Planning Commission <br />Representative. The enclosed resolution reflects the Planning <br />Commission recommendation for an approved procedure of review for <br />such requests. The illustrations were added by staff in an <br />attempt to provide an abbreviated review." <br />Callahan said, "It seems to me that we are going around in <br />circles if staff changes the plan after the Planning Commission <br />has given their consensus." <br />Mabusth clarified, "Staff did not come up with a different <br />plan, we are merely proposing a simple amendment to try to <br />appease both the Planning Commission and the applicant." <br />Callahan said, "We do not know that this plan will appease <br />the Planning Commission." <br />Mabusth replied, "It wasn't an attempt to appease the <br />Planning Commission. It was an attempt to present a moderate <br />position to the Council. This has not been presented back to the <br />Planning Commission for their comments. They were very specific <br />about their position and you may wish to ask Sara to comment <br />further." <br />Moos said, "I think the Planning Commission felt that we <br />• preferred to review the cases individually, because giving a <br />blanket approval defeats the reason why we set so many specific <br />standards when this was presented as a PRD." <br />Mayor Grabek asked Moos for her opinion regarding the plan <br />proposed,this evening. <br />Moos stated that she had not had the opportunity to <br />completely read the information packet prepared for tonight's <br />meeting. <br />Goetten asked why only Bellows and Kelley had been given <br />this most recent information. <br />Mabusth replied, "We quickly wanted to be sure that the <br />Planning Commission Representative, Maureen Bellows, who was to <br />attend the Council Meeting, had an opportunity to consult with <br />Charlie Kelley. It is appropriate that the Planning Commission <br />Representative be informed of any significant changes to be <br />presented by staff. It was appropriate for Maureen and Charles <br />to review this. If it is Council's wish to have the Planning <br />Commission review this. it can be reconsidered at their next <br />meeting. However, the Planning Commission was very adamant about <br />their position regarding any deviation from what was originally <br />approved. I believe Maureen stated that at the August 13th <br />• Council Meeting." <br />9 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.