Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE $1578- HOPWOOD CONTINUED <br />Gaffron replied, "The City Building Inspector would have to • <br />probe to locate the footings.' It may be necessary to ask the <br />property owners to uncover portions of the footings. Following a <br />thorough inspection, the Building Inspector may require that <br />portions of the structure be revised or replaced. It is <br />difficult to review footings after - the - fact." <br />Peterson stated that in her opinion, the applicants should <br />be required to pay a double fee for zoning and building permits. <br />Goetten asked staff to clarify <br />applications are normally handled. <br />Mabusth said, "Normally we ask for the <br />Gaffron added, "I don't believe that <br />was an after - the -fact application until the <br />submitted and paid their zoning application <br />how after - the -fact <br />double zoning fee." <br />anyone realized this <br />Hopwoods had already <br />and fees." <br />Mabusth said, "In this case, Michael found the owners to be <br />very responsive to the stop work order." <br />Mayor Grabek asked how much the double fee is in this case. <br />Gaffron replied, "The zoning fee is $175.00, plus the <br />additional cost for the building permit which may be another • <br />$50.00 to $100.00." <br />Nettles indicated that he preferred not to fine the Hopwoods <br />because they did cease work on the project right away. <br />Goetten stated that she concurred with Nettles. <br />Nettles asked how fees are addressed in the resolution <br />presented this evening. <br />Bernhardson replied, "The resolution makes no reference to <br />the fee at all, it will have to be amended to reflect Council's <br />decision." <br />It was moved by Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2871, as <br />amended, granting approval of after - the -fact front and side <br />street setback variances to construct a deck /walkway, with no <br />double fee for the building permit, nor the zoning application. <br />There was no second. Motion failed. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to adopt <br />Resolution #2871, as presented, granting approval of after - <br />the -fact front and side street setback variances to construct a <br />deck /walkway at 1205 Lakeview Avenue. Motion, Ayes -3, Peterson, <br />Nettles, Nay. Motion passed. <br />- 18 - • <br />