Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />.7 <br />:7 <br />' JOHN G. BENDT <br />1120 Tonkawa Rd. <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />Mr. Paul Smith <br />City Assessor <br />City of Orono <br />Dear Paul: <br />jV�j <br />V 1115 j��j��7� <br />�LSU `/Icy <br />Apr i t4P?, 19e0 law <br />Pursuant to our discussion regarding the 1990 market evaluation of my <br />home located at 1120 Tonkawa Road, I would like to offer additional <br />information to further support my position that the assessed value of <br />$379,000 for my property Is too high. <br />City records for market evaluations completed in 1989 for the 1990 tax <br />year show comparable Tonkawa Road properties to be as follows: <br />Average of Comparables $1,210 <br />My land value at the average value per shoreline foot ($1,210) would be <br />$163,350 ($1,210 x 135 feet) or $60,350 less than the 1989 assessed <br />value of my land. Subtracting this difference from the 1989 total <br />assessed value of my home and land yields a total value as follows: <br />Total 1989 Assessed Value = $356,300 <br />Minus Land Value Difference 60,350 <br />Revised Total Value $295,950 <br />The 1990 assessed value of my land and home per my latest statement <br />equals $379,000, up 6.4% from the 1989 assessed value of $356,300. <br />Applying this percentage Increase to the revised value stated above, <br />yields a 1990 total value of $314,890. <br />Paul, I believe the above analysis shows that my property's assessed <br />value has been significantly overstated, and should be adjusted to a <br />more equitable figure of $315,000. 11 ' <br />Sincerely, <br />Approximate <br />Address <br />Land Value <br />Shoreline Ft. <br />Value /Shoreline Ft. <br />John <br />G. Bendt <br />$223,700 <br />135 <br />$1,657 <br />1080 <br />Tonkawa <br />$237,000 <br />175 <br />$1,354 <br />1030 <br />Tonkawa <br />$144,500 <br />110 <br />$1,314 <br />1185 <br />Tonkawa <br />$137,300 <br />135 <br />$1,017 <br />1085 <br />Tonkawa <br />$184,000 <br />135 <br />$1,363 <br />1105 <br />Tonkawa <br />$184,000 <br />175 <br />$1,051 <br />1075 <br />Tonkawa <br />$156,500 <br />135 <br />$11159 <br />Average of Comparables $1,210 <br />My land value at the average value per shoreline foot ($1,210) would be <br />$163,350 ($1,210 x 135 feet) or $60,350 less than the 1989 assessed <br />value of my land. Subtracting this difference from the 1989 total <br />assessed value of my home and land yields a total value as follows: <br />Total 1989 Assessed Value = $356,300 <br />Minus Land Value Difference 60,350 <br />Revised Total Value $295,950 <br />The 1990 assessed value of my land and home per my latest statement <br />equals $379,000, up 6.4% from the 1989 assessed value of $356,300. <br />Applying this percentage Increase to the revised value stated above, <br />yields a 1990 total value of $314,890. <br />Paul, I believe the above analysis shows that my property's assessed <br />value has been significantly overstated, and should be adjusted to a <br />more equitable figure of $315,000. 11 ' <br />Sincerely, <br />