My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
03-12-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:21:00 AM
Creation date
4/23/2019 10:20:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 12, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1488- ROGERS CONTINUED <br />It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Mayor is <br />Grabek, to adopt Resolution #2768, granting a conditional use <br />permit for John E. Rogers, 755 Tonkawa Road, with sewer hook up. <br />Mr. Rogers' builder asked why it would not be up to any future <br />subdivider /developer of the property to pay the sewer charges at <br />the time of subdivision? Mabusth explained that it was a <br />requirement of the Code that sewer charges be paid at the time <br />the conditional use is granted. Mabusth also noted that it may <br />be beneficial for Mr. Rogers to pay the sewer charges at this <br />rate rather than paying an inflated amount in the future. Mr. <br />Rogers asked if a kitchen may be added at a later date? Mabusth <br />replied that the kitchen may be added, but that a separate <br />building permit must be obtained to do so. Motion, Ayes -5, Nays - <br />0, Motion passed. <br />#1490 K -P PROPERTIES <br />340/350 NORTH ARM LANE <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />Mr. Don Peterson was present for the review of this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the purpose of the <br />lot line rearrangement sought with this application. Bernhardson <br />stated some of the historical facts surrounding this property and <br />North Arm Lane. The Planning Commission had recommended denial <br />of the lot line rearrangement due in part to their belief that <br />17' of right -of -way should be dedicated to the City for a future • <br />road. The Planning Commission, during their review of this <br />matter, had asked whether it would be possible to dedicate 8.5' <br />in lieu of 17'. At that time, staff felt that even 8.5' would <br />interfere with the area required for the on -site septic system. <br />Bernhardson stated that further review of the site has indicated <br />the possibility of locating the septic sites in a way that would <br />allow the dedication of 8.5' of right -of -way. Bernhardson <br />suggested that should this matter be approved, it be conceptually <br />approved because the potential sites must be tested in the <br />spring. <br />Mabusth informed Council that should they require Mr. <br />Peterson to dedicate 17', Mr. Peterson would withdraw his <br />application. Mabusth suggested that the dedication of 8.5' was <br />better than no dedication from this property at all. <br />Mr. Peterson noted that if there is to be a dedication of <br />8.5' a 10' variance will be required because 20' is required from <br />the road right -of -way to a septic system. Mr. Peterson showed <br />the Council where the new septic locations will be on the <br />properties. Mr. Peterson indicated that he had no objections to <br />staff's recommendations. <br />Councilmember Callahan asked for clarification regarding the <br />10' variance for the septic system setback. <br />- 14 - 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.