Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 12, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1483 -VOGT CONTINUED do <br />and condition of this structure will now be on record <br />with the City. Goetten said that due to the fact that this <br />structure is helping to support the lakeshore bank, it should not <br />be removed. Goetten said that she would like to see a report <br />from a structural engineer. Goetten asked Mr. Vogt to explain <br />the water sources that are connected to this structure. <br />Mr. Vogt said, "There are two water sources of water going <br />into that beach house structure. At one time a lake pump was <br />used, but it is now broken. There is also a cut -off for the well <br />up at the house that feeds down to this system." <br />Goetten said that Council should address the issue of lake <br />pumping. <br />Mr. Vogt said that he has no intention of repairing the lake <br />pump. <br />Goetten indicated that if this application is approved, <br />there be no additional structural repairs allowed. <br />Mayor Grabek said that after - the -fact situations present a <br />difficult dilemma. The structure is located on the shoreline and <br />violates the intent of the 0 -75' setback Ordinances. <br />Councilmember Goetten indicated that the structure has . <br />existed for approximately 40 years. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth referred the Council to a March <br />7, 1990 memo from the Building Inspector regarding his inspection <br />of the structure. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to allow the accessory structure to <br />remain with no future structural repairs allowed. An updated <br />survey must be submitted and the water supply should be entirely <br />eliminated. Goetten said that the hardship is that the structure <br />has gone undetected for approximately 40 years and though it <br />cannot be structurally repaired, it would be unfair to ask the <br />Vogts to remove it. Councilmember Callahan asked whether <br />eliminating the water supply from the well was included in the <br />motion? Goetten indicated that she had stated that all water <br />sources be eliminated. Callahan suggested that the stove, <br />refrigerator and sink be removed and that no additional <br />facilities, bath or kitchen, be added. Callahan also suggested <br />that a structural engineer's report be submitted. Councilmember <br />Goetten agreed to include those additions in her motion, Peterson <br />seconded. Motion, Ayes -4, Nettles, Nay, Motion passed. <br />- 12 - • <br />�y <br />