Laserfiche WebLink
Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. DATA FORM Data Sheet Id: <br /> 8040 Stevens Ave. S. <br /> 293 <br /> Bloomington, MN 55420 Wetland/Area# 2W <br /> (952)888-4901 acom@iaxs.net ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Transect ID: t-2-1-u <br /> (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) <br /> Project/Site: 10346 2520 Thoroughbred Lane Orono Date. 4/27/2008 <br /> Company: City,Co,State: Orono,Hennepin County,MN <br /> Investigator: Marshal B., CommunitylD:Dist. Lawn <br /> Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No NWI ID: PEMB <br /> Is the site significantly disturbed(Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID: t 2-1-u <br /> Is the area a potential Problem Area(explain)? Yes _ No X Plot ID: Upland <br /> This site was graded. Native soil and vegetation have been removed. N Latitude: <br /> ' W Longitude: <br /> VEGETATION <br /> Dominant Plant Species(Scientific Name) Common Name Stratum %Cover Indicator <br /> ' <br /> 1 . Taraxacum ofBcinale DANDELION,COMMON Forb <5% FACU <br /> 2. Phalaris arundinacea RCG Reed Canary Grass Forb <5% FACW+ <br /> 3. Poa pratensis BLUEGRASS,KENTUCKY Forb 80%-100% FAC- <br /> Percent <br /> AGPercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(excluding FAG): <10% ❑Hydrophy is Vegetation Criterion Met? <br /> Remarks: No the criterion was not met Hydrophvtes were not dominant. <br /> 1 HYDROLOGY <br /> ❑ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: <br /> ❑ Steam, Lake,or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required): <br /> ' ®Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Oxidized Root Channels(Upper 12") <br /> ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12' ❑ Water-Stained Leaves <br /> ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑Water Marks ® Local Survey Data <br /> El Drift Lines FJ FAC-Neutral Test <br /> Field Observations: ❑Sediment ffi <br /> ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) <br /> Depth of Surface Water. None El Patterns in Wetlands E] Hydrology Assumed <br /> Depth to Free Water in Pit: None <br /> Depth to Saturated Soil: None ❑ Wetland Hydrology Criterion Met? <br /> Remarks: No. This sample lacked a primary hydrology indicator and two secondary hydrology indicators. <br />