My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
12-12-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2019 3:43:42 PM
Creation date
4/19/2019 3:42:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO TRUTH -IN -TAXATION MEETING <br />and the <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 12, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />20. 016-3884 JEFF AND PIA SCHUTT — 2750 CASCO POINT ROAD — APPEAL (continued) <br />Printup commented he would be tempted to go with an encroachment agreement. <br />Mattick stated an encroachment agreement is for something that would encroach into the City's right-of- <br />way. <br />Barnhart stated to his understanding the City Attorney was talking about modifying the section of the <br />code from a building element. Barnhart stated perhaps some language could be added or reviewed to <br />address this situation, which might be a little cleaner than the variance process. <br />Levang commented that would take a considerable amount of time since it would need to be researched, <br />go before the Planning Commission, etc. Levang stated in her view there is not a practical difficulty for a <br />variance and that one option would be to lower the height of the structure to meet the fence requirement <br />and the second option would be to petition the City to amend the Code to allow for this type of accessory <br />structure by the property line. Levang asked whether the best option would be to table the matter. <br />Barnhart stated Staff would prefer the Council act on the appeal tonight. <br />Pia Schutt stated they were under the understanding that they had the opportunity to appeal and the <br />Council had the opportunity to review the facts and possibly approve it. <br />Levang stated she was thinking about tabling it so they could decide which option they might want to <br />pursue but that she is being told that a decision by the Council should be made tonight. <br />Walsh commented people should not get too confident that the Council will change the code simply <br />because it is asked. <br />Jeff Schutt stated that is understood. <br />Printup moved, Cornick seconded, to deny the appeal by Jeff and Pia Schutt, 2750 Casco Point <br />Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(Recess taken from 8:58 p.m. to 9:06 p.m.) <br />21. #16-3885 HANS AND SHARON BERGH — 2800 SHADYWOOD ROAD — VARIANCES <br />Curtis stated the owners are planning to redevelop the property. A number of variances are required in <br />order to rebuild the home and detached garage. The new home and garage will be constructed to conform <br />to the City's floodplain regulations, which require the lowest floor of the structure to be no lower than the <br />regulatory flood protection elevation of 932.5 feet. The applicant's proposal contemplates cutting and <br />filling within the property in order to elevate the proposed home and garage to meet the low floor <br />requirements of the City's floodplain regulations. <br />Page 26 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.