Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO TRUTH -IN -TAXATION MEETING <br />and the <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 12, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />14. #15-3763/16-3860 CHRISTOPHER AND GAIL BOLLIS/CHRISTOPHER AND RACHEL <br />BOLLIS, 200-350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH -FINAL PLAT APPROVAL — RESOLUTION <br />NO. 6708 (continued) <br />3. Per the applicant's suggestion, Primary Connections; i.e., driveways from the new cul-de-sac for <br />Lots 5 and 6 must be established within 60 days after the new road and cul-de-sac reach usable <br />status. <br />4. Upon completion of those new driveways, all construction access to Lots 5 and 6 shall be via <br />those new driveways and a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued for either home until <br />covenants are in place limiting use of the back driveway to just one of the two lots. <br />Based on the above points, it would appear there are three basic scenarios to consider for permanent use <br />of Outlot A: <br />Scenario 1: Both Lots 5 and 6 are allowed to use Outlot A as a permanent secondary access. The Council <br />should determine whether an upgrade of Outlot A to private road status is required. If so, this potentially <br />requires changes to the plat of Kintyre Preserve. <br />Scenario 2: Only one of the two new lots is allowed to use Outlot A as a permanent secondary access. <br />This requires establishment of covenants and perhaps other physical barriers to ensure compliance. <br />Scenario 3: Neither of Lots 5 or 6 is allowed to use Outlot A as a permanent secondary access. If this is <br />the case, then the driveway in Outlot A and the creek crossing should be eliminated and vegetation <br />restored. <br />Staff would recommend that temporary use of Outlot A be per the Staff recommended scenario described <br />above. Staff recommends that the Council review the various options for future permanent use of <br />Tamarack Outlot A and make a decision on which scenario to require. The Development Contract will be <br />modified to reflect Council's action. Additional minor revisions to the Development Contract are <br />anticipated. <br />Staff recommends that the Council adopt the resolution, subject to the plat not being filed until such time <br />all required documents have been finalized, and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute <br />the development contract for Kintyre Preserve upon final approval by the City Attorney. The Council <br />should also determine which scenario should be required for the permanent use of Outlot A. <br />Christopher Hunt, Attorney -at -Law, noted they met with Mr. Gaffon last week and one issue that was <br />discussed in great detail was the amount of land that is being covered by the Development Agreement. <br />The developer is opposed to including Outlot A since it will not be developed and the requirements in the <br />development agreement do not apply to Outlot A. Hunt stated their thought was that if the developer <br />eventually conveys its rights in this development contract to a third party, they would lose control over <br />the development and that could limit how Outlot A could be used. Hunt noted someone would have to <br />replat that land if they were going to develop it. <br />Page 13 of 33 <br />