Laserfiche WebLink
Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com <br /> Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell <br /> Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com <br /> To clarify on some Hennepin County sites, <br /> 1. Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials <br /> 2. Many of the soils have a high organic matter content <br /> 3. The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site <br /> 4. Not all of the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators <br /> 5. Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases <br /> Hydrology <br /> The presence of current wetland hydrology was determined through direct observation of free water in the <br /> excavated soil pit, saturated soil conditions or soil redoximorphic features. However, the effect of on-or <br /> off-site hydrologic alterations may not always fully be accounted for when routine delineation methods are <br /> used. <br /> Wetland Classification <br /> Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the <br /> United States(FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979)and Wetlands of the United States <br /> (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.)Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers <br /> and Reed (1998)are given. <br /> Topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory maps, the Web Soil Survey, Aerial Photographs, and <br /> DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetland habitats. <br /> The Routine On-site Determination Method was used on this site. In this method, the following <br /> procedures were used: <br /> 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine <br /> whether 50% of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. <br /> 2) Soil pits were dug using a dutch auger to depths of 18"40", noting soil profiles and any <br /> hydric soil characteristics. <br /> 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth <br /> to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. <br /> Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags. 4-foot wood lath marked with orange <br /> "wetland boundary"flagging tape or flagging tied on vecetation may be used if site conditions warrant. <br /> Any wetlands were mapped by others using modem survey methods. At least one sample point transect <br /> crosses each delineated wetland edge. These transects consist of an upland sample point, and a <br /> wetland sample point. Other sample points may be located in areas which have one or more of the <br /> wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist. <br /> Sample points are marked with orange pin flags with a pink ribbon tied on them. Sample data sheets are <br /> found in Appendix B. <br /> Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 4 <br /> Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals <br /> Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans <br />