Laserfiche WebLink
' Print http://us-mg5.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=fs23ioOnpppnp <br /> ' Subject: RE: Spring Hill GO <br /> From: Michael J. Graham(mgraham@wenck.com) <br /> To: kjbopray@yahoo.com; <br /> Date: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:52 PM <br /> ' Hi Kelly. <br /> I did delineate almost all of the wetland that has the proposed impacts. The only part of it 1 did not delineate was a <br /> finger on the north end east of the bridge that juts out to the east. That part has nothing to do with any of the <br /> proposed impact areas. Yes,the report was focused on the two impact areas which,at that time, were the only <br /> parts of the wetland that had been delineated. I delineated the remainder(except for that east jut) later. However, <br /> the data in the delineation report should suffice for the whole basin. <br /> Mike <br /> Mike Graham,P.W.S., M.W.D.C.,Wetland Scientist <br /> Wenck Associates hie., 1802 Wooddale Drive, Suite 100, Woodbury, MN 55125-2937 <br /> www.wenck.com I mgraham@wenck.com I D 651.395.52291 F 651.228.1969 1 G 651.294.4580 C <br /> ' 612.670.4209 <br /> FYom:Kelly Bopray[mailto:kjbopray@yahoo.com] <br /> Sent:Thursday,October 11,2012 7:16 AM <br /> ' To:Michael J.Graham <br /> Subject: Spring Hill GC <br /> Good Morning Mike, <br /> On the Spring Hill Golf Course,the wetland delineation report specifically says the two impact areas(and <br /> where the mitigation will be)were delineated. The watershed asked how the rest of the wetland <br /> boundary was deturinined. Tim said it was staked by GES. <br /> Is that correct? and can I say say the report was focused on the proposed impact sites. <br /> ' Kell Bopray <br /> Y p Y <br /> Bopray Environmental Services, LLC <br /> ki b opray(cr��ahoo.com <br /> 1 of2 12/1/2012 11:20 AM <br />