04-15-2019 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

FILE#LA19-000021 15 April 2019 Page 4 of 4 Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds practical difficulties supporting the variance for the addition based on the topography of the lot and the location of the existing home. Engineer Comments The City Engineer's comments are attached as Exhibit F. Public Comments The neighbors on either side have submitted comments regarding the proposal which are attached as Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. The applicant should be required to demonstrate the relocation of the AC pad will be in a conforming location. Staff recommends the City require an encroachment agreement to address the applicant's existing retaining walls which encroach on to the adjacent City property to the west. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. City Engineer Memo Exhibit G. Neighbor Comments Exhibit H. Aerial Photos Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map