Laserfiche WebLink
* .. <br /> e 'minary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing <br /> g t 22, 1989 <br /> g 3 of 4 <br /> Lot 5, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites are located <br /> I about a third of the way back into the lot off the road, <br /> just above the woods. While additional sites probably could <br /> be located in the woods, the sites leave a relatively small <br /> building envelope near the road. Again, the sites need to <br /> be snow fenced to keep construction traffic off of them. <br /> I Both sites require mounds. <br /> Lot 6, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites, both being <br /> mound systems, are located near the north end of the <br /> property near the road. Again, topographic contours vary <br /> slightly from those shown on the survey. Slopes range from <br /> 3-6$. These sites force the house location to be more <br /> centrally located on the property. The sites need to be <br /> snow fenced to avoid traffic during road construction. <br /> I Lot 7, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites <br /> are located near the north end of this lot. Both sites <br /> require mound systems. The sites allow for great <br /> flexibility in house location. <br /> Lot 1, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites, <br /> both being mound systems, have been located on the property. <br /> House location would be relatively near the cul-de-sac. The <br /> primary site somewhat limits the potential house locations. <br /> ot 2, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites, <br /> oth being mounds, are located near the westerly corner of <br /> I his property. These sites definitely need to be fenced off <br /> uring road construction, since they are in a prime "short- <br /> ut". area. <br /> ot 3, Block 3. Both primary and alternate sites are <br /> � ocated at the extreme east end of the property, leaving <br /> reat f lexibility in house placement. These sites are not <br /> ikely to be disturbed during construction of roadways. <br /> ot 4, Block 3. The two drainfield sites are centrally <br /> ocated on the property, having some significant effect on <br /> ouse placement. The site evaluator anticipated the <br /> xisting house would be removed, with a newer house placed <br /> o the northeast corner of the lot. House placement will <br /> ave to take into account the drainfield sites. Both sites <br /> equire a mound. <br /> I <br />