Laserfiche WebLink
• . <br /> �: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br /> gr�: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br /> Date: August 22, 1989 <br /> Snbject: Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing <br /> Septic system site evaluations for this 17-lot subdivision <br /> ha�been submitted. Additionally, a topographical survey of the <br /> property containing a plot of the drainfield sites has been <br /> submitt�epdf� <br /> I^make the following comments regarding each proposed lot: <br /> Lot 1, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been <br /> located. Both t�e sites require a mound system due to high <br /> seasonal water tables. Slopes range from 2�-6$. These two <br /> sites are about 50' from a proposed detention basin, but <br /> should not affect nor be affected by that basin. The sites <br /> should be totally fenced off with snow fencing before any <br /> road or detention basin construction takes place in the <br /> subdivision. <br /> Lot 2, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been <br /> located, and both sites have soil and water table conditions <br /> to allow for a trench drainfield system. With the proposed <br /> house site at the south end of the lot, there should be no <br /> problem preserving these sites. Again, the drainfield area <br /> shou ld be f enced of f to keep a 11 traf f ic away during road <br /> and detention basin construction. <br /> Lot 3, Block 1. Again, primary and alternate drainfield <br /> �' sites are suitable for trench systems. The two sites are at <br /> the rear of the lot. With the most likely house site near <br /> the front of the lot, these sites appear to be very <br /> suitable. <br /> Lot 4, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are <br /> located on the knob at the southwest corner of the property. . <br /> Both sites require mound systems. With the house site <br /> suited for a walk-out to the northeast, a driveway would <br /> likely be centered on the lot east of the drainfield sites. <br /> Slopes are in the range of 3$, and not accurately ref lected <br /> by the topographic map. It is critical to totally enclose <br /> these sites with snow f ence prior to any road construction <br /> work, since the sites are very close to _the road. Also, <br /> road grades and cuts should be reviewed to veri..fy that the <br /> roadwork will not cut into site �2. <br /> Lot 5, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are <br /> located to the rear of the property on slopes of 0-2$. Both <br /> sites require a mound system. With the probable house <br /> centrally located o� the lot, these sites appear <br /> very suitable. � <br />