Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2004 <br /> June 17, 1993 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The second request involves installation of a paved walkway located within the 50' <br /> front/street protected area. The conditional use permit that granted approval of the planned <br /> residential development and the covenants specifically state that the only hardcover improvement <br /> allowed within the front street protected area shall be a driveway at a maximum width of 20'. <br /> The whole intent of the P.R.D. application was to minimize removal of trees. This would be <br /> the first request for the installation of a walkway within the front yard protected area. The <br /> builder, Mr. Kramer, has advised that no trees were removed as a result of the installation of <br /> the walkway as the walkway follows the line of the utility installation from Sugarwood Drive. <br /> T'he third request involves the need to fill a low retention area to the north of the existing <br /> residence, review Exhibit F. The area is located within the 50' rear protected area. The <br /> standing water has already killed off several of the trees located within the area. Applicant <br /> wishes to provide positive drainage from the residence and connect with existing natural <br /> drainageway that drains from west to east. The low area will receive approxunately 20 cubic <br /> yards of fill from the construction excavations on site. <br /> Applicant's consultants have advised that there are major problems developing with <br /> drainage for both the residence at 2002 and 2004 Sugarwoods and will file a conditional use <br /> permit application for the July meeting that will involve a more comprehensive review and <br /> improvement plan. <br /> New members should be advised that it is the responsibility of the applicant to present <br /> their position seeking to vary from the covenants. Review Exhibit H, the packet of supportive <br /> information submitted for members review and action. There is no charge by the City for these <br /> reviews. In the review of these requests the Planning Commission will have the final say. It <br /> will only be brought to the Council if applicant wishes to appeal a recommendation and final <br /> action of the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission denies a request, the applicant <br /> may proceed with an appeal to the Council at the very next Council meeting on June 28th. <br /> ch <br />