Laserfiche WebLink
' A <br /> Kathryn Alexander <br /> November 15, 2005 <br /> Page 2 <br /> My conclusion is that the proposed attachment of the riding arena converts the residence <br /> structure to something other than a `detached dwelling', and therefore would not be <br /> allowed. Additionally, if all one had to do in order to exceed the Oversize Accessory <br /> Structure standards was to somehow attach an oversize accessory building to the <br /> principal residence building, the OAS ordinance would be compromised on a regular <br /> basis. <br /> Staff would deny a building permit for the attached riding arena as presented, Your <br /> options as an applicant would include: <br /> a) Apply for a variance to the Oversize Accessory Structures ordinance to allow for <br /> a detached riding arena that exceeds the limits established in 78-1434. It is not <br /> clear whether a sufficient hardship exists to support such a variance. <br /> b) Lobby the City Council to consider revising the current ordinance to make <br /> accessory buildings exceeding the size limits of the OAS ordinance a conditional <br /> use, whereby factors such as screening, distance from lot lines or roadways, <br /> architectural compatibility, etc. could be established to allow oversize buildings. <br /> c) Appeal the staff interpretation of the ordinance to the City Council. There is a <br /> $100 fee for this process, whereby you would provide written materials <br /> supporting your position and staff would similarly provide materials to the <br /> Council supporting the staff conclusion. This would be placed on the Council's <br /> agenda typically within 2-3 weeks of the written appeal request. <br /> Please contact me at 952-249-4600 if you have any questions or if you wish to discuss the <br /> options. <br /> Sincerely, �� <br /> .,������ %�,;r-"`-- <br /> � <br /> Michael P. Gaffron <br /> Planning Director <br /> cc: Tom Barrett, City Attorney <br /> Orono Planning Staff <br />