Laserfiche WebLink
7-�4-04; i7:40 ;Lester Bullding ;3203955376 # �6/ 28 <br /> Article Request Page Page 14 of 26 <br /> 5000 <br /> � ❑ Tank 3 ��'�j•�p� B <br /> � Q Tank 4 <br /> t �Q <br /> d <br /> �� 3�a Tap Footing <br /> Midcqe Foo�ing <br /> Bottom Footing <br /> 200� <br /> � <br /> d . <br /> 10QD <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 25 <br /> Err�edmerrt Time,weeks <br /> Figure 12. Average compressive strength for cores removed from dry-mix footings subjected to <br /> water treatment B. <br /> 5000 , ,. <br /> " Vlf��r Treatment�C::: , . ;; . ... : :: .: :.: �. ..: :. <br /> � :.. � ... . <br /> = 4000 <br /> id� . <br /> c . <br /> . . ... <br /> m . <br /> � <br /> m � . <br /> •N 3000 . <br /> m � . <br /> � <br /> a , <br /> � . <br /> V 7000 - Top Footing <br /> m ❑ Tank 5 <br /> m . O Tank 6 - Midcqe Footing <br /> � - Bottom Footing <br /> 1000 <br /> 0 5 10 1� 20 25 <br /> Embedment Time,weeks <br /> Figure 13.Average compressive strength for cores removed from dry-mix footings subjected to <br /> water treaiment C. <br /> As the plots in figures 11, 12 and 13 illustrate,there is a noticeable difference between average <br /> http://asae.frymulti.com/request2.asp?JID=S&AID=14082&CID=1nv2003&v--&i=&T=1 6/4/2004 <br />