Laserfiche WebLink
7-�4-04; 17:40 ;Lester Bulidln8 ;3203955376 # �2/ 28 <br /> Article Request Page Page 10 of 26 <br /> 0.35 19.2 <br /> Tank 2 (Treatment A) � -as cm depth � <br /> �35 cm depth <br /> � 0.30 . -21 cm depih 16.4 <br /> � -7cm depth � <br /> � 0.25 13.7 � <br /> � • � <br /> U 0.20 10.9 a <br /> � � <br /> � 0.15 6.2 V <br /> � .. . . . �' <br /> � 0.10 5.5 � <br /> o � .. � � � <br /> ,.. .� : <br /> : . <br /> �' 0.05 .: . . Z.7 <br /> 0.00 . p <br /> 0 4 8 12 16 � 24 <br /> T1me,weeks <br /> Figure 8.Volumetric moisture content of sand in tank 2.Dry bulk density of sand assumed equal to <br /> 1826 kg/m3.Tanks 1 and 2 were subjected to water treatment A. <br /> 0.35 :.,:. 19.2 <br /> `-4s:cm depth: Tank 4�Treatment`Bj'. . � <br /> -��a��tn <br /> � 0.30 _21. �m depth.�. � 16.4 <br /> � -7cmde h: . . a� <br /> � 0.25 13.7 � <br /> � . a <br /> U 0.20 10.9 � <br /> � � <br /> 0 0.15 8.2 � <br /> � � U <br /> c� �1 <br /> � 0.10 ., 5.5 � <br /> � .. � . � � g <br /> a .. <br /> � 0.05 . 2.7 <br /> 0 0 <br /> 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 <br /> Time,weeks <br /> Figure 9.Volumetric moisture content of sand in tank 4.Dry bulk density of sand assumed equal to <br /> 1826 kg/m3.Taaks 3 and 4 were subj�ted to water treatment B. <br /> http://asae.frymulti.com/request'l.asp?JID=S&AID=14082&CID=1nv2003&v--&i=&T=1 6/4/2004 <br />