My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
03-18-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2019 9:25:48 AM
Creation date
3/19/2019 9:25:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#LA19-000011 <br /> 18 March 2019 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br /> Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br /> located.This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residence is an allowed use in <br /> the LR-1C District. <br /> 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br /> as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. <br /> 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br /> property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and <br /> setback with respect to the lakeshore,Crystal Bay Road,and adjacent properties create <br /> difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood.This <br /> substandard size appears to support a variance,but not a 28.8 foot reduction of the rear <br /> yard setback. <br /> 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br /> the land is located. The property's substandard size and setback with respect to the <br /> lakeshore,Crystal Bay Road,and adjacent properties create difficulties which also apply <br /> to many of the properties in the same neighborhood.See notes below. <br /> 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br /> substantial property right of the applicant. The use of the property for a single family <br /> residence is the right of the property owner. The desire to expand is not a property <br /> right. Granting rear yard setback and hardcover variances would be necessary for the <br /> preservation of the property right of the applicant. <br /> 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br /> or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting rear <br /> yard setback and hardcover variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the <br /> intent of the zoning chapter,though the amount of reduction may be. <br /> 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br /> is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances are necessary as the <br /> property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. <br /> The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br /> Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br /> impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br /> permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> Practical Difficulties Statement <br /> Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties <br /> attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> Staff finds practical difficulties inherent to the size, shape, and location of the roadway and the <br /> lake affecting the property which may justify granting variances allowing the addition. Most lots <br /> along Crystal Bay Road are non-conforming as to size and width and most lots have received <br /> variances to develop. The need for variances is fairly well established by the standards above. <br /> However, what reduction of setback is appropriate, and what level of development is too much <br /> for the lot and the neighborhood? <br /> Between 3405 and 3315 Crystal Bay Road (these addresses are accessed via,and are impacted by, <br /> the unplatted road)the smallest rear yard setbacks are 5, 6, 6.4, 7.4, and 7.5 feet. This variance, <br /> if approved,would in essence negate any rear yard setback. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.