My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: home occupation
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Spruce Way
>
4555 Spruce Way - 30-118-23-31-0003
>
Correspondence
>
Re: home occupation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:27:14 PM
Creation date
3/13/2019 11:01:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4555
Street Name
Spruce
Street Type
Way
Address
4555 Spruce Way
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
3011823310003
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 13,2009 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (Appeal of Zoning Violation,Continued) <br /> couple of years ago and that presently there is a for sale sign for one of the properties in the subdivision. <br /> Murphy noted this subdivision has very few houses. <br /> Murphy asked if Mr. Frazier uses the road that goes to the cul-de-sac. <br /> Frazier indicated he does. <br /> Murphy stated Staff should investigate this situation further,but that he is having a hard time <br /> understanding how these two trucks could be causing any problems in this neighborhood given the <br /> limited number of residents. <br /> Bremer stated in the past the City has required property owners to house their vehicles indoors and that <br /> the City's ordinance states if a commercial vehicle is owned, it must be parked indoors. <br /> Frazier indicated he does have a pole building that he could park the vehicles in but that he is currently in <br /> the process of hauling gravel in for a floor. Frazier stated he is doing it in increments due to the costs <br /> involved. <br /> Murphy reiterated that he finds it hard to understand how this could be causing an issue except for <br /> possibly one house. <br /> White pointed out that as the subdivision becomes more populated,it may become more of an issue. <br /> Bremer stated the first issue is to determine whether the home is being used as a dispatch center where <br /> employees are being dispatched to various sites. <br /> Frazier stated he no longer has a dispatch center and that the vehicles are personally owned. Frazier <br /> indicates he and his girlfriend reside in the residence and that they leave in the morning once they receive <br /> a phone call. <br /> Murphy asked what types of items they typically deliver. <br /> Frazier stated they deliver mail,manufacturing parts,and printed materials. They do not deliver any <br /> hazardous materials and all deliveries are made the same day. <br /> Mattick indicated Staff did review this item rather thoroughly at their staff ineeting and that this was <br /> initially considered a Level II home occupation. Staff did note two areas to be targeted for cleanup, <br /> which primarily related to storage of the vehicles indoors. As it relates to dispatch centers,one sentence <br /> in the ordinance deals with that subject,and the code does not specifically define what constitutes a <br /> dispatch center. Under the ordinance,the definition of a dispatch center is not contingent upon the <br /> number of calls received,having outside employees, or the number of commercial vehicles. Mattick <br /> stated if a strict interpretation of the ordinance is applied, it may appear to be a dispatch center since the <br /> two people that reside in the house are being called and sent to a different location. <br /> PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.