My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: home occupation
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Spruce Way
>
4555 Spruce Way - 30-118-23-31-0003
>
Correspondence
>
Re: home occupation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:27:14 PM
Creation date
3/13/2019 11:01:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4555
Street Name
Spruce
Street Type
Way
Address
4555 Spruce Way
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
3011823310003
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 13,2009 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> None <br /> ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br /> *4. #09-3410 JACK W. SAFAR,980 FERNDALE ROAD WEST—VARIANCE— <br /> RESOLUTION NO.5850 <br /> Murphy moved,Bremer seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5850,a Resolution Granting <br /> Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279,78-1288,78-1608(3)(c),for the Property <br /> Located at 980 Ferndale Road West. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> *5. #09-3412 CORTNEY SCOTT LeNEAVE ON BEHALF OF CORTNEY WAYNE <br /> LeNEAVE,360 WAKEFIELD ROAD—SUBDIVISION—SKETCH PLAN <br /> Murphy moved,Bremer seconded,to table Application#09-3412,Cortney Scott LeNeave on behalf <br /> of Cortney Wayne LeNeave,360 Wakefield Road,to the July 27,2009,City Council meeting at the <br /> request of the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 6. APPEAL OF ZONING VIOLATION-4450 SPRUCE WAY <br /> Curtis stated Staff did a drive-by inspection of the property located at 4450 Spruce Way following a <br /> complaint to the City. The property inspection confirmed that two Express Delivery trucks were parked <br /> at the residence and the word"Express"was printed on their address marker sign. <br /> A letter was sent to the property owner with notification that commercial use of residential property is <br /> governed by City Code 78-1376 regarding home occupations. The office of the business may be housed <br /> within their residence but the remaining business activity is not permitted. While the property does not <br /> fully meet the definition of a dispatch center as listed within 78-1376, Staff feels this business falls under <br /> the category of prohibited home occupations since the traffic level it potentially generates is similar to a <br /> dispatch center. Mr. Frazier is appealing staff's interpretation of the home occupation. <br /> Curtis stated in cases where it is unclear whether a home occupation should be classed as a Level 1 or <br /> Level 2,the zoning administrator shall make the determination,which is then subject to City Council <br /> confirmation if requested by the operator of the home occupation. In this instance, it is unclear whether <br /> the homeowner is operating a Level 2 business, but it is Staff's opinion the homeowner is operating a <br /> home business that does not qualify as either a Level 1 or a Leve12. <br /> Council is asked to review the information provided and make a determination whether the business <br /> qualifies as a Level I or II or should be prohibited. <br /> Curtis stated she does have photographs available for review. <br /> PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.