My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#6519-variances-2015
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Spring Hill Road
>
1025 Spring Hill Road - 26-118-23-43-0005
>
Resolutions
>
#6519-variances-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:18:57 PM
Creation date
3/7/2019 11:33:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1025
Street Name
Spring Hill
Street Type
Road
Address
1025 Spring Hill Road
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
2611823430005
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. d5?9 <br />WHEREAS, on May 18, 2015, the Planning Commission's recommendations were based on <br />the following findings. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS <br />Regarding the additions and modifications to the existing home: <br />1) The proposed one—story additions or modifications to the home will be low profile, will not <br />be visible from the lake, and will not adversely impact existing lake views enjoyed by <br />adjacent lakeshore properties. <br />2) The variance to allow additions and modifications to the home within the 100 foot lake <br />setback will alleviate a practical difficulty inherent to the location of the existing home on <br />the Property and not created by the Applicants. <br />3) The Applicants' proposal to construct additions and make modifications to the existing <br />home results in 28,909 square feet of hardcover or 11.1% where 25% is the maximum <br />permitted by code; the Property exceeds 2.0 acres therefore structural coverage <br />limitations do not apply. <br />4) The proposed additions to the home are not out of character with the neighborhood and <br />will meet side and rear setbacks. <br />Regarding the in -ground pool: <br />5) The variance to place hardcover and structure within the 75 -foot setback limits <br />opportunity for stormwater infiltration and is not in harmony with the general intent and <br />purpose of the Ordinance. <br />6) The variance to construct an in -ground pool consisting of structure and hardcover within <br />75 feet of the OHWL is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />7) The applicant has not established that there are practical difficulties. <br />8) The variance to allow an in -ground pool to be constructed within 75 -feet of the OHWL is <br />inconsistent with the majority of the large lot properties in Orono on Long Lake and will <br />alter the essential character of the locality. <br />9) The Applicants have sufficient alternate locations to on the Property to construct a <br />conforming in -ground pool; the granting of the variance to permit an in -ground pool to be <br />constructed within the 75 -foot setback is not necessary for the preservation and <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right of the Applicants. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.