#4896-variance-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. `4 , � l � O� O O ,� .: ;.. �, CITY of URONO � ti �� G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ��kESYi04'� NO. � � g � 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The structural coverage on the lot is increasing to 1,723.62 s.f. (3.9%)well below the allowed 15%. B. The hardship is the existing house location in relation to the front lot line. C. The existing residence was built in 1945,prior to current zoning standards. � D. The well and septic system are in locations that are not affected by the proposed addition. E. The interior layout of the house would make it difficult to construct a functional attached garage/bedroom at a location not needing a variance. F. The adjacent properties are not affected by the attached garage/bedroom addition. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiaz to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light, air,nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properiy;would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrabl� hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfaze of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIO\'S Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow construction of an Page 2 of 6