Laserfiche WebLink
���p CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> y�, ,,� No. 6 9 4 4 <br /> G <br /> ��kFSHO�� <br /> 3. The Property contains 45,933 square feet(1.05 acres) in area and has a defined lot width <br /> of 140 feet at the OHWL, and 172 feet at the 75-foot setback. <br /> 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater <br /> Quality Overlay District. <br /> 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance: <br /> a. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances <br /> upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br /> conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br /> of property in the surrounding area. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ."The requested average lakeshore setback variance is in <br /> harmony with the Ordinance as the most adjacent neighbors are situated such that their <br /> channel/lake views are not across the subject property and their views will not be impacted <br /> by the improvements. <br /> 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan."The variances resulting in a permit for construction of an addition to <br /> an existing single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br /> practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in <br /> connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br /> a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonab/e manner, <br /> however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br /> The request to permit construction of building and structural improvements <br /> lakeward of the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable as the <br /> owners of the adjacent properties have stated that they are not adversely <br /> impacted; the mature vegetation, topography, and home orientation separate the <br /> Property from the adjacent neighbors. <br /> 2 <br />