My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
01-22-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2019 10:58:43 AM
Creation date
1/23/2019 10:58:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM <br /> LA18-000103 <br /> 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br /> permitted by the Zoning Chapter. <br /> Response: The property owner is proposing a ground-mounted solar array located in the southwest <br /> corner of their property. A ground-mounted solar array is a reasonable mannered use per the intent <br /> of the ordinance. <br /> 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br /> by the landowner. <br /> Response: The landowner's property is heavily forested, has a small pond in the front yard, and a <br /> septic system located north of the home. Additionally, the roof is heavily shaded by the trees located <br /> around the home. Each of these conditions was not caused by the property owners. <br /> 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> Response: This variance will not alter the essential character of the locality because it will be well <br /> screened from Wakefield RD due to the circumstances of the property. Also, the landowner is working <br /> with Prairie Restoration to remove non-native vegetation south of the ground mount and will be <br /> screening the solar array with native vegetation from the Luce Line State Trail. Thus improving the <br /> essential character of the locality with native vegetation. <br /> 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use <br /> for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. <br /> Response: Access to direct sunlight is the driving practical difficulty. No economic considerations are <br /> the driving force of this variance application. <br /> 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br /> for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as <br /> defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this <br /> Chapter. <br /> Response: Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.357, Subd. 6 states that "Practical difficulties include, but <br /> are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy system". This location of the <br /> ground-mounted solar array has the most direct access to sunlight on the property, thus it complies <br /> with the guidelines of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.357, Subd. 6. <br /> 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any <br /> use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected <br /> person's land is located. <br /> Response: Alternative energy systems are permitted within all zoning districts. <br /> 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family <br /> dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.