My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
01-22-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2019 10:58:43 AM
Creation date
1/23/2019 10:58:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region <br /> Project/Site 387 Orono Orchard Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 5/29/18 <br /> Applicant/Owner: George Stickney State: Minnesota Sampling Point: 3-2-WET <br /> Investigator(s): ACM Section,Township, Range: Sec.2,T117N, R23W <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): none <br /> Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum: <br /> Soil Map Unit Name Muskego and Houghton soils VWI Classification: PEM1C/PFO1Ad <br /> Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) <br /> Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y <br /> Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y <br /> Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: <br /> Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) <br /> VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species <br /> 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 9 (A) <br /> 2 Juniperus virginiana 5 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant <br /> 3 Quercus bicolor 5 Y FACW Species Across all Strata: 10 (B) <br /> 4 Percent of Dominant Species <br /> 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 90.00% (A/B) <br /> 15 =Total Cover <br /> Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet <br /> 1 Rhamnus cathartica 60 Y FAC Total%Cover of: <br /> 2 OBL species 35 x 1 = 35 <br /> 3 FACW species 60 x 2= 120 <br /> 4 FAC species 65 x 3= 195 <br /> 5 FACU species 10 x 4= 40 <br /> 60 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 <br /> Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 170 (A) 390 (B) <br /> 1 Carex pellita 25 Y OBL Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.29 <br /> 2 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW <br /> 3 Typha angustifolia 10 Y OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> 4 Urtica dioica 10 Y FACW Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation <br /> 5 Pilea pumila 10 Y FACW X Dominance test is>50% <br /> 6 Vitis riparia 10 Y FACW X Prevalence index is 553.0* <br /> 7 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 N FACU Morphogical adaptations*(provide <br /> 8 Solanum dulcamara 5 N FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a <br /> 9 separate sheet) <br /> 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* <br /> 95 =Total Cover (explain) <br /> Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) <br /> *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be <br /> 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic <br /> 2 Hydrophytic <br /> 0 =Total Cover vegetation <br /> present? Y <br /> Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) <br /> US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.