#6552-variances/CUP-2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ��o�o C ITY OF 4RON0 RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'Y COUNCIL � �� 5 � � �' �' N O. lAkE S H�� (g) The church use including signage at this location will continue to be consistent with the character of the surrounding area. (h) The church use including signage at this location will continue to be consistent with the character of the surrounding area. (i) The church use including the proposed signage is not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally pernutted uses. (j) The proposed landscaping will add to the visual appearance of the proposed signage which does not require buffering or screening. (k) The proposed use of the sign includes limiting the frequency of inessage changes so that rapidly changing messages will not be a distraction to drivers, and the automatic dixnming feature of the sign will ensure that excess glare and light pollution is avoided. (1) The proposed use will not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access. The proposed sign will have no impact on traffic levels or parking. (m) The sign is intended to match the architectural styling of the church and is not anticipated to have any environmental impacts. (n) The automatic dimming feature of the sign message boazd will ensure that excess glare and light pollution is avoided. The back-lighting of the signage outside the message board is not anticipated to cause glare. (o) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,public safety, or general welfare. 6. The City Council has considered this application includin� the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance and CUP on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions e�usting on this property are peculiaz to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance and CUP would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Page 4 of 6