Laserfiche WebLink
i�� <br /> //� O� <br /> O O <br /> ��. CITY of ORONO � <br /> � � � <br /> �� G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��sH�4'� NO. � � � �' <br /> B. The property is a conforming lot. Variances should only be considered <br /> when there are no other reasonable options on a property. <br /> C. The garage addition could be shifted 9.5' to the west leaving a 30' <br /> - setback. -The impact on the house would result in the elimination of one <br /> garage door. The actual gazage space would not be reduced. The fact <br /> that the proposed gazage is attached to the house requires it to meet the <br /> ' r 30' setback for principal structures. <br /> D. A detached building 750 s.f. or less is only required to meet a 10' side <br /> setback. The detached building must have a minimum of 10' separation <br /> beriveen it and the principal building. Sliding the garage back to be 10' <br /> from the principal building also moves the garage back out of the 30' top <br /> of bluff setback, thus eliminating the need for any variances for the <br /> garage. <br /> 7. At the Council meeting of May 28, 2002 the applicants withdrew their request <br /> for variances to permit a side yard encroachment and bluff impact zone <br /> encroachment for an attached gazage. <br /> 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect tra�c conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would �not merely , <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hazdship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 9. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the DNR, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance <br /> on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />