My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-06-2017 Park Commission Packet
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
2017
>
11-06-2017 Park Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2019 9:36:57 AM
Creation date
1/8/2019 9:35:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, September 5, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Meyers asked if the yellow lines depict trails that could be constructed tomorrow if the City had the <br />money. <br />Barnhart stated those were goals identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Barnhart pointed out the <br />Orono Preserve property on the overhead. Barnhart stated when that project came through, there was <br />quite a bit of discussion about whether a trail easement should be granted. The Council at that time <br />recognized that if they do not acquire an easement at the time of development, it would be very difficult <br />to get one later. In addition, an easement along the Eisinger property was granted. <br />Barnhart stated he would recommend that if there is a trail easement that is vital, the Parks Commission <br />identify that. Barnhart stated Staff can spend the resources to go through the files to see if there is an <br />easement but that in his view it would be more beneficial for the Parks Commission to identify potential <br />trails or connections. <br />Meyers stated he is more interested in trail connections and that the Parks Commission should look into <br />that. Meyers stated one of the biggest goals is to make the connection between the Luce Line and the <br />Dakota Trail. <br />Johnson stated he thought perhaps the minutes would show when and where easements were granted. <br />Barnhart stated an easement is recorded against the property and that Staff would have to go through file <br />by file to see whether an easement exists. Barnhart recommended the Parks Commission identify the trail <br />and then Staff could see whether easements exist. <br />Barnhart stated the survey would help identify areas where there is interest in a trail. The survey would <br />also provide support for the trail. <br />Rief stated in the City he was at previously, they were able to obtain over a 10 percent engagement by <br />utilizing social media. Rief stated one of the things he has seen in other cities is a huge demand for trails, <br />which they will likely see in this area, and that the Comprehensive Plan is kind of the Parks Commission <br />wish list. <br />Meyers noted ten years ago Orono did not have the Dakota Trail, which increased bicyclists in the area <br />ten -fold, and that in his view there is a big demand for trails. <br />Williams asked how the survey was administered. <br />Rief indicated it was all done on Facebook and online and they spent less than $100. <br />Ruegemer moved, Berg seconded, to recommend that the City Council consider conducting a <br />citizens survey regarding parks, trails and recreation as part of the Comprehensive Plan Update. <br />VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />5. PUBLIC WORKS PARKS UPDATE <br />Edwards reported on the following items: <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.