Laserfiche WebLink
MINVrES OF THE <br />ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br />Monday, March 6, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />The estimated cost for the project is $59,000, with nine acres of hilltop clearing, or $38,000 with 4.5 acres <br />of hilltop clearing. Both proposals contain ongoing maintenance of the prairie land. Edwards noted the <br />City currently spends about $3,000 on Lurton Park for annual vegetative maintenance and management. <br />Edwards stated the bigger ticket items of this project could be funded entirely from the Park Dedication <br />Fund. Some of the smaller items, such as signs, trail clearing, and gates, could be funded from the Parks <br />Operations and Maintenance budget, with the remaining portions coming from the Park Fund. <br />The Park Commission should review the draft information signs as well as the improvement project plans <br />and then make a motion recommending approval of one of the options to the City Council. <br />Bryce Johnson stated the Park Commission needs to make sure they are not creating a fuzzy area between <br />capital improvement and maintenance. Johnson stated in his view, to the extent the area is actually being <br />cleared and redone, along with the signs and bench, the park could be called out as a capital improvement. <br />Johnson stated in his view clearing the trail might be more maintenance but the signs and a bench would <br />be a capital improvement. <br />Meyers stated clearing around the parking lot and trails would be work that could be done by Sentence to <br />Serve and that professionals will do the land clearing. Meyers stated the Public Works Director could <br />determine if it is legitimate capital improvement. <br />Bryce Johnson asked what the 20 percent contingency would be. <br />Edwards indicated it is a standard engineering tool that is used in determining a price and that 10 percent <br />is administrative and 10 percent is unexpected items, such as bids that come in higher than expected. <br />Meyers noted the Park Commission discussed the two plans at their work session and at that time the <br />commissioners felt that the $37,000 was a more reasonable approach. Meyers noted the Park <br />Commission will also be taking on Big Island and the golf course so there might be other capital <br />improvement items coming up. <br />Brenda Johnson asked if the funds for those two parks used to come out of the Park Dedication Fund. <br />Edwards stated maintenance of Big Island comes out of the regular park operation and budget. Edwards <br />indicated he would need to see where some of those funds came from for projects such as the shoreland <br />restoration. The annual maintenance, such as mowing and the putting in and taking out of the docks has <br />been a budget item for the parks operational budget. <br />Bryce Johnson stated the purchase of the docks came out of the Park Dedication Fund. <br />Brenda Johnson stated given that Saga Hill is a big park, it seems that if the Park Commission is going to <br />improve Saga Hill, they should do everything they want to do since coming back Iater is harder. Johnson <br />stated if there really is so much interest in Big Island, there should be some donations coming in. <br />Meyers suggested keeping Big Island as a separate piece from Saga Hill. Meyers stated to his <br />understanding the Park Commission had agreed on Option 1, which was the $38,000 amount. <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />