Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> , Inspector initials/Date: <br /> Property address: <br /> 4. Soil Sepa�dtion—Compliance component#4 of 5 <br /> Date of installation: ❑ Unknown Ver�cation method(s): <br /> ShorelandNVellhead protectioNFood Beverage �Yes ❑No 3oi1 obse►vation does not expire. Previous soil <br /> �odging7 observations 6y two independent padies aie sufficient, <br /> Com liance c�iteria: _ _ _ unless site conditions have been altered or local <br /> requirements differ. <br /> For systems built prior to April 1, 1996,and ❑Yes ❑ N� � �onducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) <br /> not located in Shoreland or Wellhead <br /> Prntec6on Area or not serving a food, ❑ Two previous veriflcations(Attach bonng logs) <br /> beverage or lodging establishment: ❑ Not applicable(Holding tank(s),no drainfield) <br /> Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Expianation) <br /> separation distance from periodically ❑ Other(See Comments/F�cplanation) <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. <br /> Non-perfom►ance systems built Apri11, ❑Yes ❑No Comments/Explanation: <br /> 1996, or later or for non performance <br /> systems located in Shoreland orWellhead <br /> Protection Areas or serving a food, <br /> beverage,or lodging establishment: <br /> Drainfield has a three-foot vertical <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock.' <br /> "Experimental", "Other', or "Performance" ❑Yes ❑ No IndiCate de ths of elev8tions <br /> systems built under pre-2008 Rules;Type IV A. Bottom of distribution media <br /> or V sysfems built under 2008 Rules(7080. <br /> 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector <br /> License required) B. Periodicall saturated soiUbedrock <br /> Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. S stem se aration <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil Or bedrock. D. Re uired com liance se aration� <br /> Any"no"answer above indicates the system is *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local <br /> Failing to Protect Groundwater. Ordinance. <br /> 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*—comp�iance component#5 of 5 ❑ Not applicable <br /> Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes ❑ No If"yes",A below is required <br /> Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes",B below is required <br /> BMP=6est Management Pracfice(s)specified in the system design <br /> !f the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be comp/eted. <br /> Com liance criteria <br /> a. Operating Permit number: ❑Yes ❑No <br /> Have the O eratin Permit re uirements been met? <br /> b. Is the re uired nitro en BMP in lace and ro rl functionin ? ❑Yes ❑ No <br /> Any "no"answer indicates Noncompliance. <br /> Upgrade Requtrements(Minn. Stat.§115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be upgraded,replaced,or its use <br /> discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinence.If the system is failing to protect <br /> ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required 6y local ordinance.If an existing system <br /> is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced,or <br /> its use dlscontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This prov/sion does not apply to systems!n shaeland areas, <br /> We/lhead Protection Areas,or those used in connection with fo0d,beverage,and lodging establishments as defined in law. <br /> www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in altemati�Qge 3 of 3 <br /> wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 <br />