My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: septic lot line issue
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Silver Meadow Drive
>
375 Silver Meadow Drive - 33-118-23-42-0004
>
Septic
>
Re: septic lot line issue
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:51:30 PM
Creation date
1/4/2019 12:49:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
375
Street Name
Silver Meadow
Street Type
Drive
Address
375 Silver Meadow Drive
Document Type
Septic
PIN
3311823420004
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> � <br /> ; <br /> : � <br /> � <br /> Robert Self ski <br /> Auqust 2, 1990 <br /> � Paqe 2 <br /> � lo! line to thc toe of the mound. It appears obvious after-the- <br /> 1 far.�t tha� �hey did not adhere closely to that plan, or that they <br /> � d� d not actually know where the lot line was. . <br /> � Possible options for you to consider should you wish to pursue <br /> ; thzs issue might include the following: <br /> 1� 1. Proceed with a lot line rearrangement between your <br /> ' property and that to the south, to move the lot line to a <br /> location meeting a minimum 10' setback from the toe of the <br /> mound. This would require a subdivision application with <br /> the CitYhat both �lots end upswithmarminimumrof 2uacres in <br /> ensure t <br /> area. <br /> 2. Pursue the idea of having American Sewer & Water remove <br /> the portions of mound that do not meet the required setback. <br /> This likely would result in the need to extend the mound <br /> southward. however. , my personal opinion is that as long as <br /> that system �s working, all parties involved would be better <br /> off to leave it alone as is, and not risk the potential of <br /> damaging it while attempting to extend it. <br /> 3. You c�uld consider granting an easement to the neighbor <br /> for some consideration . <br /> 4. You could ignore the situation, given that the setback <br /> question is ar.guable and most of yo�r eptions wi11 result in <br /> some expense on your part to pursue them. <br /> One issue you t�rouoht up was the idea of slightly regrading <br /> within your property boundaries to bring the area of the mound <br /> encroachment back to conformity with the rest of your property. <br /> I su�+pos�+ ther. c is a s 1 i ght pc�ssibi 1. i ty that by removing the <br /> tapsoil down to the sand base that thAre could be some seepage <br /> onto your pro�ert-y, hokever, I think this possibility is minimal. <br /> Y�u w�u 1d ha ve ' c� c-c�nsu 1 t an attorn�y to determine whether you <br /> would be liabl �• :or any damages you could cause to the neiqhbots <br /> systcm ��ithin ��c���z� �i-��erty bounc3ari�� . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.