My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/20/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10/20/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 12:27:48 PM
Creation date
12/21/2018 12:27:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 20,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> devoted to streets and increase the amount of land devoted to conservation. Flexibility from the <br /> maximum cul-de-sac length standard can be provided through the PRD. <br /> In addition,the applicants have indicated that some of the internal street curves do not meet the City's 30 <br /> mile per hour design standard. The City Engineer will need to provide comment on this matter as well as <br /> other street-related issues. <br /> Grittman noted the applicants have conducted a traffic study of the proposed project,which has been <br /> reviewed by the City Engineer. In general the traffic study has found that the area roadways and <br /> intersections have more than sufficient capacity to handle the demand created by the development and <br /> that no changes to existing roadway design are necessary to accommodate the plat. The only exception to <br /> this is the turn lane on westbound West Branch at the development entry point to Lake View Parkway. <br /> A number of the residents had raised concerns over the design and conditions at the intersection of North <br /> Arm and County Road 19,but the study conducted by Hennepin County found that the intersection meets <br /> the minimum visibility requirements and the project will not impact those conditions. <br /> Staff does recommend one possible change to the street pattern. The southern portion of Lake View <br /> Parkway is intended to be aligned with Forest Arms Road to the south. However, due to the entrance <br /> monument island proposed for Lake View,there appears to be a misalignment as it is shown on the plat. <br /> Staff believes that the southbound exit lane of Lake View should be aligned to ensure that concurrent left <br /> turning traffic from both Lake View and Forest Arms Road onto West Branch will not create turning <br /> conflicts. <br /> All proposed lots demonstrate an ability to meet required principal building setbacks. The black boxes on <br /> the plat illustrate the likely or potential building sites but are not the final design for any lot. Each lot is <br /> likely to be custom graded with house design, grading, and driveway access designed for the purchaser. <br /> The proposed plat shows potential building sites that would meet the code requirements for setback and <br /> reasonable driveway access, along with septic and well sites to serve the lot. As a result,no variances <br /> should be needed to accommodate future home construction. <br /> A total f nine outlots are proposed within the subdivision. With the exception of Outlot C and Outlot I, <br /> the proposed outlots will be owned and maintained by the homeowners association. Outlot C is proposed <br /> to be replatted as an individual residential parcel for sale and development at some point in the future. <br /> Outlot I will potentially become a privately owned public park. If the park concept does not work out,the <br /> outlot may be replatted as a residential parcel. <br /> Two trail connections are proposed between North Arm Drive and Lake View Parkway. Grittman stated <br /> it is presumed that these trails will be private in nature but should be confirmed by the applicants and be <br /> specifically addressed within the subdivision development agreement. No trails and/or sidewalks have <br /> been proposed along the periphery of the site. <br /> Approximately one-third of the septic sites are wholly or partially within the conservation easement. The <br /> acceptability of the containment of septic sites within conservation easements should be determined as <br /> part of plat approval. The homeowners association will be responsible for monitoring the use and <br /> maintenance of the conservation easement areas. The City Engineer has provided a number of comments <br /> relating to the septic sites and will need to be integrated into the Planning Commission's review and <br /> recommendations. <br /> Page 5 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.