My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/21/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
07/21/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:46:32 AM
Creation date
12/21/2018 11:46:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 21,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Johncox stated it could be rented out to an electrical company that needs warehouse space along with <br /> some office space. Johncox stated he plans on using the space at least for the next five years or so. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 8:58 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 8:58 p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated the Planning Commission has discussed in the past that if the uses can be made <br /> independent of each other,that that is something that needs to be closely looked at. Leskinen stated if an <br /> office/warehouse is to become a permitted use in this district,the standards and ratios would need to be <br /> very clear if the City goes the route of a zoning code amendment. <br /> Landgraver stated typically the warehouse space is directly linked to the office space and that in the <br /> example given earlier,there were three or four separate businesses in the building. <br /> Johncox noted there are only 14-foot ceilings and that it would be difficult to use it as a true warehouse. <br /> Johncox indicated it really would have to be looked at as a storage area. <br /> Thiesse stated he has a difficult time envisioning it as a warehouse. <br /> Leskinen stated whether it is called material storage or a warehouse, it should be used in conjunction with <br /> the office space. <br /> Schoenzeit stated a grocery store will have an office front with storage in the back. Schoenzeit stated the <br /> question is whether there is a supply and demand for this type of use in this area. Schoenzeit stated in his <br /> view the City should encourage this type of investment given the fact that the building has been for sale <br /> for five years. <br /> Thiesse stated if someone cannot utilize a forklift in the area, it should not be defined as a warehouse and <br /> that materials storage area might be a better term. <br /> McGrann stated the Planning Commission should look at this as storage and not a warehouse. <br /> Schoenzeit noted the applicant would not have a retail office. <br /> McGrann stated it could be retail or more service related, such as a cleaning company. <br /> Schoenzeit stated retail implies that people will be coming to the building. <br /> Mack stated there could also be some additional building codes that need to be addressed based on the <br /> materials storage and cleaning supplies that would be stored there. Mack stated the use should be <br /> defined. <br /> Johncox stated no chemicals would be manufactured there but that they would be stored there. <br /> Page 27 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.