My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/17/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
03/17/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:05:25 AM
Creation date
12/21/2018 11:05:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 17,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> 3. #14-3656 BRIAN NELSON ON BEHALF OF THOMAS RANDGAARD,2765 <br /> SHADYWOOD ROAD,AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, <br /> 6:43 P.M.—7:23 P.M. <br /> Brian Nelson, Applicant, was present. <br /> Curtis stated the property owner was notified by the City last March that construction and/or earthwork <br /> within 75 feet of the lake requires a permit from the City. The letter was sent to the property owner as a <br /> courtesy in response to the City receiving notification of a Minnehaha Creek Watershed issued permit for <br /> rip-rap work. Also in March of 2013, the property owner received a permit from the City to remove a <br /> legally non-conforming porch from the south side of the home within 75 feet of the lake. <br /> In February of 2014, the applicant met with Planning Staff to discuss City requirements and the various <br /> aspects of the project that were already underway. Those projects include constructing two south facing <br /> elevated patios to replace an existing deck on the east and an existing porch with an on-grade patio on the <br /> west side of the property, both of which have been removed; re-paving the existing sidewalk with paver <br /> stones; and installing two rain gardens on the north side of the property. The property owner also <br /> received a cost-share grant from the MCWD to install shoreline buffer vegetation on the northern <br /> shoreline. <br /> The creation of the rain gardens and installation of the elevated patios result in filling and grading within <br /> 75 feet of the lake, which requires a conditional use permit. The sidewalk and the patios are not exact in- <br /> kind footprint replacements according to Staffs observations. In order to reorient or relocate non- <br /> conforming hardcover existing within 75 feet of the OHWL, a hardcover variance is required. <br /> The applicant is requesting after-the-fact conditional use permit approvals for land alteration in excess of <br /> ten cubic yards conducted within 75 feet of the OHWL to install rain gardens and elevated patios. An <br /> after-the-fact hardcover variance is also requested in order to approve the rearrangement of sidewalk <br /> hardcover as well as two elevated patios which were constructed in place of an existing porch that has <br /> been removed and an existing deck within 75 feet of the OHWL where structure or hardcover is normally <br /> not allowed. <br /> Because lake exists on both the north and the south sides of the property,the majority of the subject <br /> property is unbuildable as it is located within 75 feet of the OHWL. Lakeshore on two sides of a property <br /> as shallow as this one creates a practical difficulty. As a result, both proposed patios are located within <br /> 75 feet of the lake. The applicant has indicated that both patios are to be constructed in the same footprint <br /> as the pre-existing deck and porch. Hardcover within 75 feet of the lake is limited to driveways, stairs, <br /> lifts, landings and lockboxes. The applicant intends to replace non-conforming hardcover without <br /> increasing the square footage within the 75-foot setback. <br /> City Code requires that landowners must obtain a conditional use permit from the City prior to engaging <br /> in activities that include fill to elevate or alter the existing natural grade. Of the conditions required to be <br /> met, Items 2, 6, 7, 9, and 13 are generally applicable. Staff went through the analysis in the Staff report <br /> and Staff can discuss that if the Planning Commission wishes. <br /> According to State Statute, an existing non-conforming structure may be reconstructed in-kind provided <br /> the permit or request to do so is submitted within one year of removal. The property owner removed the <br /> porch in March of 2013 and the land use application was submitted on February 19, 2014, less than one <br /> Page 4 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.