Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 17,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> John Daly, Revisions, LLC, was present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance in order to conduct <br /> improvements to the existing home and roofline ahead of the average lakeshore setback. The property <br /> owners are currently undergoing an interior remodel of the home and the builder is requesting approval of <br /> the setback variance to allow for primarily cosmetic improvements to the roof of the existing home on the <br /> property. <br /> Due to the configuration of the lakeshore and the neighboring homes,the existing home is situated almost <br /> entirely ahead of the average lakeshore setback line. Since the property to the west is vacant, the average <br /> lakeshore setback line for the subject property is somewhat assumed. The applicants have also proposed <br /> to remove the east lake-facing deck and construct a new deck with a screen porch and chimney facing the <br /> lake on the east side of the home ahead of the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed <br /> improvements to the home will be conforming with respect to all zoning district and lake setbacks, height, <br /> structural coverage, and hardcover limitations with the exception of the average lakeshore setback. <br /> The majority of the new roof with proposed screen porch and deck will be constructed entirely ahead of <br /> the average lakeshore setback line. The applicant has provided illustrations which highlight the proposed <br /> changes to the roof and the home. Portions of the roof will be raised above existing by two feet. The new <br /> deck will replace an existing deck which extends approximately two feet closer to the lake. The proposed <br /> screen porch will meet the required 30-foot side setback from the east property line but will be considered <br /> new structure ahead of the average setback line. A 30-foot tall chimney is also proposed to serve the <br /> fireplace to be installed in the screen porch on the east side. <br /> Due to the orientation of the lakeshore,the subject property functions as though it is a peninsula. The <br /> existing home is located almost entirely ahead of the average lakeshore setback line based on the existing <br /> home to the east and an estimated conforming location of a future home on the vacant lot to the west. <br /> Even with the nonconforming location of the previous home on the vacant lot to the west,the subject <br /> home is well ahead of the average lakeshore setback line and the home to the east is located well to the <br /> north of the subject home. <br /> It does not appear the views of the lake from the home to the east will be adversely impacted by the <br /> applicants' proposed changes to the roof. There is a significant amount of tree vegetation between that <br /> property and the subject property. The proposed screen porch, chimney and new deck may be visible <br /> from the property to the east, however, as that home appears to be primarily situated to face toward the <br /> southeast and does not have significant windows facing the lake over the subject project. Based on the <br /> shape and orientation of the vacant lot, it is reasonable to assume that a new residence will orient toward <br /> the lake and not over the subject property. <br /> Staff has not received any public comments regarding the request. Staff finds there is a practical <br /> difficulty in the shape and orientation of the property and lakeshore. In addition,the orientation of the <br /> adjacent lots toward the lake and the existing trees on the applicants and neighbor's property help ensure <br /> that the views of the lake enjoyed by the neighbors will not be significantly impacted by the proposed <br /> screen porch with chimney, new deck, and changes to the shape and height of the roof. <br /> If the Planning Commission finds practical difficulties exist justifying the requested variances, a <br /> recommendation of approval of the average lakeshore setback variance would be appropriate. <br /> Page 12 of 26 <br />