My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/21/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
01/21/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 10:45:18 AM
Creation date
12/21/2018 10:45:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,January 21,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> c. A "park model" 12-foot wide by 40-foot long, would not be allowed. Functionally,the ordinance <br /> eliminates the establishment of a manufactured home that is less than 20 feet wide for use as a <br /> dwelling. <br /> Gaffron noted this item has again been published for a public hearing. Staff recommends holding the <br /> hearing, taking any public comments that may be forthcoming, and then discuss whether the draft <br /> ordinance language meets the goal and intent of establishing reasonable minimum dimensions and sizes <br /> for dwellings. <br /> Lemke asked what would happen in an octagon situation. <br /> Gaffron stated at some point a definition of length or width will need to be created. <br /> Thiesse asked if he has a house that is 100 feet wide on the lake but it is only 20 feet deep, if the <br /> measurement would go the other direction or whether it would always be the longest direction. <br /> Gaffron stated if you have both standards in place, it should not matter because the standard is the same <br /> whether it is length or width. <br /> Thiesse stated he would like to avoid the situation where someone comes in with a new definition that has <br /> not been considered. <br /> Gaffron stated using length as opposed to width and depth would help clarify it. <br /> Schoenzeit stated there could also be a total number that has to be met. <br /> Landgraver stated the question is whether the Planning Commission should address odd shaped structures <br /> at this point. <br /> Schoenzeit commented at some point those type of structures may require a variance. <br /> Landgraver noted the goal of the Planning Commission was to establish a basic framework for minimum <br /> dwelling sizes and that they knew they would not be able to address all situations. Landgraver concurred <br /> the City would have the variance process to address the unique situations. <br /> Gaffron stated to his recollection the other cities' codes did not define length and width and that he is not <br /> sure whether a definition could be crafted that works in every case. <br /> McGrann stated in his view a uniquely shaped house will probably tend to be larger rather than smaller. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if Staff cares anything about the specs on the inside. <br /> Curtis stated the building code would address that. <br /> Acting Chair Landgraver opened the public hearing at 9:14 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this item. <br /> Page 25 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.