My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/21/2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
10/21/2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 3:42:07 PM
Creation date
12/20/2018 3:42:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,October 21,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Thiesse noted there is still approximately 50 percent of the property that is proposed to remain as open <br /> space. <br /> Leskinen stated she has trouble of delaying it on the back of an individual property owner. <br /> Leskinen moved, Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 13-3639, Source <br /> Land Capital,LLC,on behalf of Grant Wenkstern,405 North Arm Drive,granting of a <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment based on Staffs recommendations outlined as A through G on <br /> Page 9 of Staffs report. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 1,McGrann Opposed. <br /> Grittman stated if the Planning Commission has some specific design direction,they should provide that <br /> to the applicant. <br /> Leskinen noted the motion was just on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and that the Planning <br /> Commission will next discuss the sketch plan. <br /> Lemke stated he likes the clustering option but that he has some issues with the road being too close to <br /> the two property owners. Lemke stated in his view it is likely some of the water issues would be <br /> mitigated with the construction of the road. <br /> Thiesse asked if the cul-de-sac to the right could accommodate a road and that that area seems to be a <br /> better location than running it through the two properties. <br /> Gaffron indicated there is a 1,000 or 1,100 lineal foot limitation on cul-de-sacs and that he is not sure <br /> whether that area could accommodate it. <br /> Hiller stated they would be open to exploring options and that they wanted to present an option that took <br /> into account the neighbors' concerns. Hiller indicated it was their understanding that there needs to be <br /> two entrances/exits to the development. <br /> Thiesse asked if it is possible to bring the six lots to the northwest into the project with a cul-de-sac so the <br /> development is totally contained. Thiesse requested the developer explore that option. <br /> Hiller noted this is a low area which is why they laid it out the way they did. <br /> Leskinen stated she was happy to see the change in the relocation of the entrance off of North Arm, which <br /> was a big concern for the neighbors. <br /> Schoenzeit stated unfortunately the City Code in this process does not require the developer to discuss the <br /> digital infrastructure. Schoenzeit pointed out this part of Orono has a very weak communications <br /> infrastructure and that it is likely the expectation of these homes in the $600,000 to the $2 million range <br /> will be that they will have Internet access or the ability to make a cell phone call. Schoenzeit stated he <br /> would encourage the developer to show how they have reached out to Verizon to perhaps bring in a cell <br /> tower or otherwise develop some type of digital plan. Schoenzeit stated while the City has done a lot of <br /> work getting the wire to people's houses,the Internet service is slow and the phone lines get tied up. <br /> Hiller stated they have not gotten that far in the process but they will see what they can do. <br /> Page 38 of 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.