Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,October 21,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Leskinen indicated she has no issues with the application. <br /> Schoenzeit moved,Thiesse seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 13-3635,Dale <br /> Peterson and Gail Ledstrom,3515 and 3465 Sixth Avenue North,vacation of Rocky Knoll Drive, <br /> and to recommend cross-easement be required. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> 8. #13-3636 LIXIAO WANG,3059 FARVIEW LANE,VARIANCES,8:21 P.M.—8:38 P.M. <br /> Lixiao Wang, Applicant,was present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a 12' x 34' one-level garage <br /> addition to the home. The applicant recently purchased the subject property and wishes to make some <br /> structural additions to better accommodate vehicle parking. <br /> Curtis noted there is a small portion of the southwest side of the home that currently encroaches into the <br /> 75-fot setback. The retaining walls located at the entry and the northeast corner of the home currently <br /> encroach into the required 30-foot setback. The applicant's home is situated entirely ahead of the average <br /> lakeshore setback line. <br /> The garage addition is proposed to be constructed over existing driveway hardcover resulting in 36 square <br /> feet of additional hardcover for 11.8 percent total for the site where 25 percent is allowed. The proposed <br /> garage addition at 19.7 feet will encroach ten feet into the required 30-foot side yard setback. The garage <br /> portion of the home currently meets this setback. The existing retaining wall and access stair are set back <br /> only 13 feet from the side lot line and a corner of the home also encroaches 1.4 feet into the side setback <br /> area. <br /> The proposed garage addition is to be constructed by extending the lakeside wall of the home toward the <br /> east. Due to the angle of the home and the lakeshore,the resulting setback for the addition will be 72.1 <br /> feet from the lake where a 75-foot setback is required. Approximately 42 square feet of additional <br /> structure within the 75-foot setback is proposed. <br /> Due to the large wetland on the property,the entire home is situated ahead of the average lakeshore <br /> setback. Curtis stated it seems apparent that the additions or modifications that were done over the years <br /> were done in an attempt to be respectful of the side yard setback and lake. <br /> The proposed addition results in more massing within the east side yard setback area and within the <br /> average lakeshore setback, which may impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent owner. <br /> Staff finds that the applicant has failed to demonstrate a reasonable practical difficulty supporting <br /> additional structure within the 75-foot setback area. In addition,the applicant has failed to demonstrate <br /> that enforcing the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive them of the reasonable use of the <br /> property. For these reasons,Planning Staff recommends denial of the variances. <br /> Andy Schrader, Schrader&Companies, stated he is here to answer any questions the Planning <br /> Commission may have. <br /> Lixiao Wang stated the current structure is 18 feet deep and was built many years ago. Wang indicated <br /> the garage does not accommodate their vehicles and that he has to leave his truck and SUV outside. <br /> Wang stated he also owns three cars and that he only has a two-car garage. Wang stated those are the <br /> Page 20 of 42 <br />