Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 19 2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The following approvals are required: <br /> 1. A conditional use permit for establishing and operating a Class II restaurant with liquor within a <br /> 40' x 52' portion of the existing building which has previously been occupied by other unrelated <br /> businesses. <br /> 2. An element of the Cup request is for permission to allow outdoor seating at the rear of the newer <br /> restaurant, adjacent to the City-owned parking lot but within the applicant's property. The site <br /> plan and survey depictions do not provide dimensions for this patio area and dimensionally are <br /> inconsistent with each other. The patio appears to be around 350-400 square feet in area. The <br /> applicant has verbally indicated that the depictions are not accurate and the patio area is intended <br /> to be larger than that. The outdoor seating area is adjacent to a proposed 67 square foot vestibule <br /> addition to the building. <br /> 3. The application is subject to the Site Plan Review process established via Ordinance No. 68, <br /> Third Series, adopted in February, 2010. <br /> Gaffron noted this property was the subject of an intensive 10-month CUP review in 2005 and 2006 when <br /> the applicant was proposing to expand the Narrows Saloon into these spaces. That application was <br /> somewhat controversial and brought forth a variety of neighborhood concerns related to issues of building <br /> expansion, music/sound containment, parking and proposed outdoor smoking/seating areas in both the <br /> front and rear of the building. Ultimately, a pared-down approval was granted for the expansion per the <br /> findings and conditions of Resolution No. 5440 adopted in March, 2006. That plan was never followed <br /> through with by the applicant. <br /> Gaffron stated the outdoor dining area walls are ten feet from the west side lot line. The applicant's plans <br /> do not depict the height of any proposed wall or fence. The patio walls and fencing, if less than six feet in <br /> height, will be considered as a non-encroachment on yard requirements. From Staff's perspective, the <br /> fences and walls proposed are clearly a non-encroachment. The fire place may fall under the category of <br /> recreational equipment and the Planning Commission should consider whether the fireplace fits within the <br /> definition of non-encroachments. <br /> As was the case in 2005 and 2006, a primary concern for both the interior and exterior use and the <br /> potential activity associated with the businesses has to do with parking. It is difficult to park anything on <br /> the property. The question is whether there will be any parking available on the applicant's site and <br /> whether there will be adequate parking in the City lot since the proposed use adds a requirement for 13 <br /> additional parking stalls based on the square footage. <br /> Gaffron indicated the applicant is also proposing seating in the basement consisting of 1,250 square feet, <br /> which would bring the total square footage of the restaurant to 2,750 square feet. Storage and non-public <br /> spaces will total approximately 1,250 square feet. The exterior public space in the patio area is likely <br /> around 750 to 1,000 square feet. The applicant's architect has not provided information regarding seating <br /> capacity, occupant load, or parking demand. <br /> A parking analysis conducted in 2005 showed some parking stalls abutting the Narrows building. That <br /> area has not been striped in recent years and it is unclear whether that parking area will eventually be <br /> eliminated. At that time it was determined that 52 parking stalls would be required. Based on Staff's <br /> calculations of public floor areas for the new restaurant and patio area, it is anticipated that 70 parking <br /> Page 2 of 28 <br />