My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/15/2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
07/15/2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 3:29:25 PM
Creation date
12/20/2018 3:29:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 15,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The current plan for the new home results in 13 percent hardcover where 25 percent is normally allowed <br /> within Tier 1. This does include the proposed 222.5 square feet for the proposed stair and retaining wall <br /> hardcover within the 0-75 foot zone. Within the 75-foot setback area,the applicant's plan attempts to <br /> reduce the visual impact of the stair by setting it into the grade as much as possible. The plan results in <br /> the need for retaining walls on the up and down slope sides of the stairs. The bottom section of the stairs <br /> will be supported by a retaining wall up to four feet in height as viewed from the lake. The City's <br /> landscape architect has reviewed the landscape plans and the revised plans are included in the Planning <br /> Commission's packets. <br /> By code,the City must review the proposed conditional use at the property within certain criteria <br /> contained in Section 78-916. Staff has reviewed the criteria and has found that Items 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13 <br /> are generally applicable to this property. Curtis indicated she can go through the Staff analysis if the <br /> Planning Commission has questions concerning any of the criteria. <br /> Based on Staff's analysis,the applicant's plan appears to be consistent with the City's goals and the <br /> criteria. Staff finds that the conditional use permit for the retaining walls and stair work within the 0-75 <br /> foot zone appears to be reasonable and consistent with similar properties in the neighborhood and the <br /> landscape plan offers a natural looking slope. <br /> The applicant has considered the City's comments regarding the landscape plan and has provided <br /> clarification and a revised plan today. The City's landscape architect has been asked to provide any <br /> additional comments. Those additional comments can be addressed prior to the City Council meeting if <br /> the Planning Commission wishes to move this application forward. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance to allow 222.5 square feet of hardcover and a <br /> conditional use permit for the work within the 0-75 foot zone to construct the stair system,the walls, and <br /> the proposed landscape plan. The City Engineer has conducted a cursory review of this plan. The most <br /> significant concerns were noted at that time. However, a full engineering review will be conducted at the <br /> time of administrative permit. <br /> Landgraver asked if Staff has had time to adequately review the information that was distributed this <br /> evening. <br /> Curtis indicated not thoroughly. <br /> Dale Gustafson, Landscape Designer, stated in order to clarify the changes made today,they are based on <br /> the idea that additional screening can be done along the staircase. Some plants were added to the left of <br /> the wall that would be two to four feet high and will help hide the bottom edge of the stairway. The <br /> previous plants were smaller grass and were not really intended to help screen the staircase. Gustafson <br /> noted they also have identified a group of plants that was missed in the first landscape plan. <br /> Lemke asked if the 22-inch oak would be disturbed at all by the staircase. <br /> Gustafson stated in his view it should not be since they have attempted to keep a good distance away from <br /> the tree with the stairs. Gustafson noted some of the other trees in the area have been removed. <br /> Lemke noted to the west there is an existing staircase and asked whether that would be removed. <br /> Page 2 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.