My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/15/2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
07/15/2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 3:29:25 PM
Creation date
12/20/2018 3:29:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 15,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> this situation must ultimately be determined by the Planning Commission and City Council. On two <br /> occasions in the past,the City has determined that the lot should not be built upon. <br /> Gaffron indicated that in the resolution approved in 1978,the Council adopted a number of findings <br /> supporting denial. The current applicant claims in his practical difficulties statement that those findings <br /> include"numerous gross errors and mistruths,"but does not provide any supporting evidence or detail <br /> regarding this claim. Staffs responses to those errors and mistruths are outlined in the report. <br /> Gaffron stated as it relates to consistency with Orono's Comprehensive Plan, Exhibit Q is an excerpt from <br /> the Land Use Plan element of the 2000-2030 Community Management Plan. The Land Use Goals and <br /> Policies established in the CMP are further supported by similar goals and policies throughout the <br /> Environmental Protection Plan element. In each case,the City's philosophy has been to limit <br /> development density for the protection of Lake Minnetonka,to limit changes to the lakeshore,to protect <br /> lakeshore vegetation and to avoid overloading the natural surface water drainage and filtration systems. <br /> Gaffron requested the Planning Commission review Exhibit Q and other sections of the CMP. He noted <br /> the sections generally do not support the development of substandard property that leads to excessively <br /> high densities near the lakeshore. <br /> As it relates to the conditional use permit, Gaffron stated that Section 78-1286 prohibits grading, filling, <br /> or excavating more than 10 cubic yards of material within 75 feet of the lake. Because the proposed site <br /> grading plan will involve more than 10 cubic yards of earth movement within 75 feet of the lake, a <br /> conditional use permit and variance are required. The grading plan involves excavating for the new house <br /> foundation, fill lakeward of the house to alleviate drainage issues, and grading swales on either side of the <br /> house and within the right-of-way of Orchard Beach Place to direct runoff past the house and driveway. <br /> The proposed grading plan places the southeast corner of the ground floor of the house about two feet <br /> above existing grade and the northwest corner of the house about 2-1/2 feet below existing grade. The <br /> lower level is a story,not a basement, and the house proposed is,by definition, a two-story house with a <br /> defined height of 23 feet and a peak height of 29 feet. <br /> Gaffron noted the applicant would be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well <br /> as the permitting requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The applicant's grading plan <br /> does not appear to create unstable slopes and results in slopes that are flatter than 3:1. There are no <br /> alterations being proposed below the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka. Gaffron noted there <br /> are some potential impacts to the adjoining property to the west and north associated with construction of <br /> the new house but there are not inherently likely as a result of grading into the base of the steep slope and <br /> creation of swales along the westerly site boundary. In addition,there is a risk to a number of protected <br /> trees on the property as a result of the grading. <br /> Gaffron noted there are a number of letters from neighbors included in the Commissioners' packets that <br /> clearly suggest the neighborhood does not want this property to be granted variances to make it a <br /> buildable lot. Gaffron noted an additional e-mail was received this morning from the owner of the <br /> property located at 1530 Orchard Beach Place indicating his opposition to the project. <br /> Gaffron requested the Planning Commission review the summary of pertinent issues and potential <br /> findings included in Staffs report. He indicated it is Staffs finding that development of this property with <br /> a single-family residence would have negative impacts on the character of the neighborhood,which <br /> Page 12 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.