Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 17,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Rozeboom, 2967 Casco Point Road, indicated he is and that his only question was runoff. Rozeboom <br /> stated they expected the runoff to go into the storm sewer and asked if that is where it is headed or if there <br /> is some sort of underground piece that is there before it goes into the lake. <br /> Gaffron indicated he is not sure what is out there currently and that they will need to ask the City <br /> Engineer to review the system, but that he would expect there to be a catch basin. <br /> Curtis noted it would need to meet the requirements of the City Engineer before it is approved by the <br /> City. <br /> Rozeboom commented it is a very nice design and that the proposed residence is smaller than what <br /> currently exists and less imposing even with it being located closer to the lake. The architecture and <br /> aesthetics are very compatible with the neighborhood. Rozeboom stated if the drainage issue is <br /> engineered to a point that everyone is comfortable that no additional water is going across their street, he <br /> would not have any issues with the application. <br /> Bonnie Martinson, 2970 Casco Point Road, stated the drainage system goes across their property line and <br /> to the neighbors to the south. After an inch of rain yesterday, the current system could not handle it and it <br /> was going across their property to get to the lake. At the present time the water comes from the hill and <br /> across the street from a culvert. <br /> Martinson indicated she is not quite sure how that drainage system is going to work once the house is <br /> elevated. Martinson stated that is a question they have and that there also is a lot of debris coming <br /> through the drain system into the lake. Martinson indicated she is not sure how often the City cleans that <br /> drain out. <br /> Thiesse indicated he visited the property this afternoon and stood at the back corner of the house to the <br /> south and looked at the lake view. The lake view did not start until the 34" maple tree, which is going to <br /> remain. Thiesse stated in his view he does not believe that even from the back corner of the house the <br /> neighbor's view will be impacted. The intent of the code is to protect the lake views, and by moving the <br /> house forward, it should not negatively impact the views of the neighbors. <br /> Landgraver stated he does not have any reason to vote against the application since it is very similar to <br /> what exists now. Landgraver noted the drainage issue is not something the Planning Commission would <br /> be able to deal with tonight. <br /> Schoenzeit commented it is unusual to call out hardcover and structural coverage numbers at a meeting <br /> and that the applicants should submit a survey to confirm that. <br /> Curtis indicated they have submitted it tonight. <br /> Leskinen noted the applicants are also requesting a conditional use permit as well as a variance to the <br /> average lakeshore setback. The code is in place to preserve the views of the adjoining neighbors, and if <br /> those are not impacted, Leskinen indicated she would not have an objection to the average lakeshore <br /> setback variance. <br /> Krogness agreed with Chair Leskinen. <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br />