Laserfiche WebLink
We ha�r reviewted the proposed capital projects and ha�e the Iollo�inr couiments: <br /> -��. ' Proiects CIP-C I t01�1'ea•man l.)icch�,C`IP_CS__(Casco f'i�in� Swale),C1P-11Stubhs Ba}_Izavine <br /> Stabilizatic�n. and C.1P-7 Lon� C.�ikc Ravine 5tabilization) <br /> _.�S_ .. _.�_.._.._�._ '� <br /> �I he Uirect Volume method of calculatin� lo�d reduction hy streauri �tabilization is an acceptable <br /> method, however, rnore detail shc�uld he provided to justify the"volume voided'�and"years'� <br /> varial�les. Actual lace area measurements and justification t<7r reccssion rates should be provided <br /> The calculations in the a��pendi�c lur the Stubbs l3ay priiject inrluded only the vegetative <br /> stabilization poi-�ion of the project; �x,>calc�ilatiun�are shown fix the proposed rep��ir of the <br /> catasU�ophic fail�n�e portion of the pr��ject. <br /> �b_ • G1P�1.1 IContributi�n to South Katrina Marsh P�ect <br /> Frich subwatershed plan in tl�e C1ti'Rh1P includes load reductions from regulation, LGU assigneci <br /> load reductian,and District external�jnd internal (oad hrc�jects. �he South Katrina Marsh pr�ject <br /> is part of the Uisb•ict's Jennings I3ay external load reduction plan,thus it cannot he used to satisfy <br /> the LGU load reduations.'I o do so�vould"double caunt" the reduction.(Note: 'The City hxs <br /> proposed Hdditionai BMl's suf(icieut tn ineet the reyuired reduction I'or the Nainler Creek <br /> sut��vatershe�l.} <br /> ,��. — • Ordinauce Ke��isio�is <br /> 'I'he MC'N�i)'s Stormwnrer M�nagement Rule is currently undergoing revision nnd is se.hedul�d to <br /> he c�mpleted h��the end c�f the year. 1'he C'ity and MCUVD�;-i11 need to�oordinate to deterrnine <br /> how much of a reduction the C`ity c�n be credited with t<�r their proposed ordinance. <br /> �,--- 3. /de�rtrfj;Ke�-C'ot�servatiorr Areas (kCA)cn�d assess ncleguac:.t�qf loc•a!p<�fiei�s rn�c�co��trc�ls lo <br /> cor�serve�heir flvctrule,�;ic crnd eculoKica] vahres A figure sha�ti•ing the KCAs should be added to the <br /> Plan,as weU as xdditiunal discussie�a� describing more specitically how the Cit�• iutends to achieve <br /> this management goal. <br /> Minnesota Rules 8410 Requirements <br /> �{-, ----- 4. Ptn��ase. StaTute requires each plan tc�contain a section titled "Purpose."which explains the purpose <br /> of water►rianagement pl�nning. '1'his information is contained in section L I of the Plan,which eauld <br /> sitnply l�e renamed"Purpose" instead of"[3ackground." <br /> 5, 5. I'inancia!cw�sicleratiu�rs. 'l�he Plan states that the prima�y sourec of fundi��g for the Irnplementation <br /> Plan(IP)activities is the Cit}'s stormwater utility, «�hich currently generates abaut $135.000 per <br /> year. It is stated that the utility plus other funds such as grants shuuld be sufticient to fund the IP. <br /> However,the annual cosr of IP activities varies$232,400-$331,400.The 1'lan should include a <br /> discussion of hnw die Ciry w�uld prioritize activities if sulTicient funds�re no� available,or whether <br /> the City would consider raising its utility rates to generate more revenue. <br /> �---�- 6. A►r�e»clinert�procc:dure. Section 10,3 should note thflt Che C'ity must complete Any amendmcnts to its <br /> l,ocal Plan�vithin two years afier tl7e adoption of C'WKN1Y revisions or the next CW1tMl'. <br /> Additional MCWD CVVRMP Reyuircmcnts <br /> -�,— 7. Park and open s��ace in�e���nlrvn. Discussion should bc added to the Plan describir�g how water <br /> resow�ces planning�vill be incorporated with parks and open space planning. <br /> I'agc?c�f 3 <br />